Dunkelberg Hartmut, Schmelz Ulrich
Medical Institute of General Hygiene and Environmental Health, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;30(2):179-83. doi: 10.1086/593208.
The sterility assurance level of 10(-6) is an established standard that defines the quality of sterile products. The aim of the present study was to develop a method that correlated the results from microbial-barrier testing of flexible sterile barrier systems with the estimated microbial challenge that the package encounters during storage and transport.
The effectiveness of microbial-barrier packaging was determined by the use of an exposure chamber test with 20 periodic atmospheric pressure changes of 50 and 70 hPa. Flexible peel pouches were used as sterile barrier systems. The logarithmic reduction value of a sterile barrier system was calculated on the basis of the experimental results and compared with the logarithmic reduction value required for the microbial challenges to maintain sterility during transport and storage.
For pouches made of paper and plastic-film material, a logarithmic reduction value of 5.4 was obtained on the basis of 30 of 99 plates becoming nonsterile after being exposed to a 50 hPa difference in periodic atmospheric pressure changes. For pouches made of paper and plastic-film material, a logarithmic reduction value of 5.2 was obtained on the basis of 48 of 100 plates becoming nonsterile after being exposed to a 70 hPa difference in atmospheric pressure. For pouches made of nonwoven and plastic-film material, logarithmic reduction values of 6.38 (ie, 3 of 99 plates became nonsterile after being exposed to a 50 hPa pressure difference) and 6.07 (ie, 3 of the 99 plates became nonsterile after being exposed to a 70 hPa pressure difference) were obtained. Calculating an expected microbial challenge during transport and storage that requires barrier properties corresponding to a logarithmic reduction value of 5.83 and taking the sterility assurance level into account, we found that only the nonwoven pouches fulfilled the European standard EN 556-1.
Using the data obtained in a microbial exposure test with a specified flow rate of a bacterial aerosol, we found that the effectiveness of the sterile barrier system against the actual microbial challenge can be examined and evaluated at the sterility assurance level of 10(-6).
无菌保证水平为10⁻⁶是定义无菌产品质量的既定标准。本研究的目的是开发一种方法,将柔性无菌屏障系统的微生物屏障测试结果与包装在储存和运输过程中遇到的估计微生物挑战相关联。
通过使用暴露室测试来确定微生物屏障包装的有效性,该测试具有20次50和70 hPa的周期性大气压力变化。柔性剥离袋用作无菌屏障系统。根据实验结果计算无菌屏障系统的对数减少值,并与在运输和储存期间保持无菌所需的微生物挑战的对数减少值进行比较。
对于由纸和塑料薄膜材料制成的袋子,在暴露于50 hPa的周期性大气压力变化差异后,99个平板中有30个变得无菌,由此获得对数减少值为5.4。对于由纸和塑料薄膜材料制成的袋子,在暴露于70 hPa的大气压力差异后,100个平板中有48个变得无菌,由此获得对数减少值为5.2。对于由无纺布和塑料薄膜材料制成的袋子,获得的对数减少值分别为6.38(即暴露于50 hPa压力差异后99个平板中有3个变得无菌)和6.07(即暴露于70 hPa压力差异后99个平板中有3个变得无菌)。计算运输和储存期间需要对数减少值为5.83的屏障性能并考虑无菌保证水平的预期微生物挑战,我们发现只有无纺布袋子符合欧洲标准EN 556 - 1。
使用在具有特定细菌气溶胶流速的微生物暴露测试中获得的数据,我们发现可以在无菌保证水平为10⁻⁶的情况下检查和评估无菌屏障系统对实际微生物挑战的有效性。