Feig S A, Shaber G S, Patchefsky A, Schwartz G F, Edeiken J, Libshitz H I, Nerlinger R, Curley R F, Wallace J D
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977 Mar;128(3):403-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.128.3.403.
Findings by xeromammography and clinical examination were compared in 16,000 self-selected women aged 45-64 who participated in a voluntary breast cancer screening program. A total of 138 malignancies were detected: 108 (78%) by mammography and 78 (57%) by clinical examination. Mammography was more effective for large breasts, fatty breasts, and in older women. Conversely, clinical examination was more effective for small breasts, dense breasts, and retroareolar lesions. Clinical detection decreased strikingly for lesions with negative lymph nodes, in situ and microinvasive lesions, deeply situated lesions, and lesions where microcalcifications were the sole mammographic finding.
在16000名年龄在45至64岁之间自愿参加乳腺癌筛查项目的女性中,对干板乳腺摄影检查结果和临床检查结果进行了比较。共检测出138例恶性肿瘤:乳腺摄影检查发现108例(78%),临床检查发现78例(57%)。乳腺摄影检查对大乳房、脂肪型乳房及老年女性更有效。相反,临床检查对小乳房、致密型乳房及乳晕后病变更有效。对于淋巴结阴性的病变、原位及微浸润性病变、深部病变以及仅以微钙化作为乳腺摄影唯一表现的病变,临床检出率显著降低。