Bell David, Heitmueller Axel
University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom.
J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):465-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
The enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990 triggered a substantial academic debate about its consequences on employment rates of disabled people. In contrast, the employment provision of the 1996 Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) in Britain has received little attention. Exploiting both pooled and longitudinal data, this paper provides robust evidence that, similar to the ADA in the USA, the DDA has had no impact on the employment rate of disabled people or possibly worsened it. Possible reasons for this are higher uncertainty around litigation costs, low levels of general awareness about the Act among disabled people and employers, and a lack of financial support.
1990年《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)的颁布引发了一场关于其对残疾人就业率影响的激烈学术辩论。相比之下,英国1996年《残疾歧视法案》(DDA)中的就业条款却很少受到关注。本文利用汇总数据和纵向数据,提供了有力证据表明,与美国的《美国残疾人法案》类似,《残疾歧视法案》对残疾人就业率没有影响,甚至可能使其恶化。造成这种情况的可能原因包括诉讼成本的不确定性更高、残疾人和雇主对该法案的普遍认知水平较低以及缺乏财政支持。