Suppr超能文献

反歧视立法对健康不佳和残疾所导致就业后果方面的社会经济不平等有何影响?

What are the effects of anti-discriminatory legislation on socioeconomic inequalities in the employment consequences of ill health and disability?

作者信息

Bambra Clare, Pope Daniel

机构信息

Centre for Public Policy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 May;61(5):421-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.052662.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how anti-discrimination legislation in the form of the UK Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) affected socioeconomic disparities in the employment rates of people with a limiting long-term illness (LLTI) or disability.

DESIGN

National cross-sectional data on employment rates for people with and without an LLTI or disability were obtained from the General Household Survey (GHS) for a 14-year period (1990-2003; 12 surveys). Representative population samples were analysed. The sample size for the GHS over the study period ranged from 19,193 to 24,657 and the average response rate ranged from 72% to 82%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Age-standardised employment rates for individuals with and without an LLTI or disability, analysed by sex and socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Analysis of covariance identified that the DDA had had a negative effect on employment rates for individuals with an LLTI or disability during the study period. This negative effect was found to be differential according to social class ranging from no effect in social classes I and II (-2.86%, 95% CI -8.7% to 2.99%), increasing with social class group, to a highly significant effect in social classes IV and V (-10.7%, 95% CI -6.16% to -15.24%). No differential effect was identified by sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-discriminatory legislation is not an effective way of overcoming the employment consequences of ill health and disability, nor is it a useful public policy tool in terms of reducing inequalities.

摘要

目的

调查以英国《残疾歧视法》(DDA)形式存在的反歧视立法如何影响患有长期限制性疾病(LLTI)或残疾人士的就业社会经济差异。

设计

从一般家庭调查(GHS)中获取了14年期间(1990 - 2003年;12次调查)有和没有LLTI或残疾人士的就业率全国横断面数据。对具有代表性的人口样本进行了分析。研究期间GHS的样本量从19193人到24657人不等,平均回复率从72%到82%不等。

主要观察指标

按性别和社会经济地位分析有和没有LLTI或残疾人士的年龄标准化就业率。

结果

协方差分析表明,在研究期间,DDA对患有LLTI或残疾人士的就业率产生了负面影响。发现这种负面影响因社会阶层而异,从社会阶层I和II中无影响(-2.86%,95%置信区间-8.7%至2.99%),随社会阶层组增加,到社会阶层IV和V中有高度显著影响(-10.7%,95%置信区间-6.16%至-15.24%)。未发现性别差异影响。

结论

反歧视立法不是克服健康不佳和残疾对就业影响的有效方式,在减少不平等方面也不是有用的公共政策工具。

相似文献

2
Has the Disability Discrimination Act closed the employment gap?《残疾歧视法》缩小了就业差距吗?
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Oct 30;27(20):1261-6. doi: 10.1080/09638280500075626.
9
Burden of disability in a post war birth cohort in the UK.英国战后出生队列中的残疾负担。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Jun;48(3):262-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.3.262.

本文引用的文献

1
Has the Disability Discrimination Act closed the employment gap?《残疾歧视法》缩小了就业差距吗?
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Oct 30;27(20):1261-6. doi: 10.1080/09638280500075626.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验