Bambra Clare, Pope Daniel
Centre for Public Policy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 May;61(5):421-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.052662.
To investigate how anti-discrimination legislation in the form of the UK Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) affected socioeconomic disparities in the employment rates of people with a limiting long-term illness (LLTI) or disability.
National cross-sectional data on employment rates for people with and without an LLTI or disability were obtained from the General Household Survey (GHS) for a 14-year period (1990-2003; 12 surveys). Representative population samples were analysed. The sample size for the GHS over the study period ranged from 19,193 to 24,657 and the average response rate ranged from 72% to 82%.
Age-standardised employment rates for individuals with and without an LLTI or disability, analysed by sex and socioeconomic status.
Analysis of covariance identified that the DDA had had a negative effect on employment rates for individuals with an LLTI or disability during the study period. This negative effect was found to be differential according to social class ranging from no effect in social classes I and II (-2.86%, 95% CI -8.7% to 2.99%), increasing with social class group, to a highly significant effect in social classes IV and V (-10.7%, 95% CI -6.16% to -15.24%). No differential effect was identified by sex.
Anti-discriminatory legislation is not an effective way of overcoming the employment consequences of ill health and disability, nor is it a useful public policy tool in terms of reducing inequalities.
调查以英国《残疾歧视法》(DDA)形式存在的反歧视立法如何影响患有长期限制性疾病(LLTI)或残疾人士的就业社会经济差异。
从一般家庭调查(GHS)中获取了14年期间(1990 - 2003年;12次调查)有和没有LLTI或残疾人士的就业率全国横断面数据。对具有代表性的人口样本进行了分析。研究期间GHS的样本量从19193人到24657人不等,平均回复率从72%到82%不等。
按性别和社会经济地位分析有和没有LLTI或残疾人士的年龄标准化就业率。
协方差分析表明,在研究期间,DDA对患有LLTI或残疾人士的就业率产生了负面影响。发现这种负面影响因社会阶层而异,从社会阶层I和II中无影响(-2.86%,95%置信区间-8.7%至2.99%),随社会阶层组增加,到社会阶层IV和V中有高度显著影响(-10.7%,95%置信区间-6.16%至-15.24%)。未发现性别差异影响。
反歧视立法不是克服健康不佳和残疾对就业影响的有效方式,在减少不平等方面也不是有用的公共政策工具。