• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反歧视立法对健康不佳和残疾所导致就业后果方面的社会经济不平等有何影响?

What are the effects of anti-discriminatory legislation on socioeconomic inequalities in the employment consequences of ill health and disability?

作者信息

Bambra Clare, Pope Daniel

机构信息

Centre for Public Policy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 May;61(5):421-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.052662.

DOI:10.1136/jech.2006.052662
PMID:17435209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2465696/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how anti-discrimination legislation in the form of the UK Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) affected socioeconomic disparities in the employment rates of people with a limiting long-term illness (LLTI) or disability.

DESIGN

National cross-sectional data on employment rates for people with and without an LLTI or disability were obtained from the General Household Survey (GHS) for a 14-year period (1990-2003; 12 surveys). Representative population samples were analysed. The sample size for the GHS over the study period ranged from 19,193 to 24,657 and the average response rate ranged from 72% to 82%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Age-standardised employment rates for individuals with and without an LLTI or disability, analysed by sex and socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Analysis of covariance identified that the DDA had had a negative effect on employment rates for individuals with an LLTI or disability during the study period. This negative effect was found to be differential according to social class ranging from no effect in social classes I and II (-2.86%, 95% CI -8.7% to 2.99%), increasing with social class group, to a highly significant effect in social classes IV and V (-10.7%, 95% CI -6.16% to -15.24%). No differential effect was identified by sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-discriminatory legislation is not an effective way of overcoming the employment consequences of ill health and disability, nor is it a useful public policy tool in terms of reducing inequalities.

摘要

目的

调查以英国《残疾歧视法》(DDA)形式存在的反歧视立法如何影响患有长期限制性疾病(LLTI)或残疾人士的就业社会经济差异。

设计

从一般家庭调查(GHS)中获取了14年期间(1990 - 2003年;12次调查)有和没有LLTI或残疾人士的就业率全国横断面数据。对具有代表性的人口样本进行了分析。研究期间GHS的样本量从19193人到24657人不等,平均回复率从72%到82%不等。

主要观察指标

按性别和社会经济地位分析有和没有LLTI或残疾人士的年龄标准化就业率。

结果

协方差分析表明,在研究期间,DDA对患有LLTI或残疾人士的就业率产生了负面影响。发现这种负面影响因社会阶层而异,从社会阶层I和II中无影响(-2.86%,95%置信区间-8.7%至2.99%),随社会阶层组增加,到社会阶层IV和V中有高度显著影响(-10.7%,95%置信区间-6.16%至-15.24%)。未发现性别差异影响。

结论

反歧视立法不是克服健康不佳和残疾对就业影响的有效方式,在减少不平等方面也不是有用的公共政策工具。

相似文献

1
What are the effects of anti-discriminatory legislation on socioeconomic inequalities in the employment consequences of ill health and disability?反歧视立法对健康不佳和残疾所导致就业后果方面的社会经济不平等有何影响?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 May;61(5):421-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.052662.
2
Has the Disability Discrimination Act closed the employment gap?《残疾歧视法》缩小了就业差距吗?
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Oct 30;27(20):1261-6. doi: 10.1080/09638280500075626.
3
The Disability Discrimination Act in the UK: helping or hindering employment among the disabled?英国的《残疾歧视法》:对残疾人就业是助力还是阻碍?
J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):465-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
4
Disability prevalence and disability-related employment gaps in the UK 1998-2012: Different trends in different surveys?1998 - 2012年英国的残疾患病率及与残疾相关的就业差距:不同调查中的不同趋势?
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;141:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
5
Increasing earnings of social security disability income beneficiaries with serious mental disorder.患有严重精神障碍的社会保障残疾收入受益人收入增加。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2014 Jun;17(2):75-90.
6
Twice upon a time: Examining the effect socio-economic status has on the experience of dyslexia in the United Kingdom.曾几何时:审视社会经济地位对英国诵读困难症体验的影响。
Dyslexia. 2019 Feb;25(1):3-19. doi: 10.1002/dys.1606. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
The wellbeing of working-age adults with and without disability in the UK: Associations with age, gender, ethnicity, partnership status, educational attainment and employment status.英国有/无残疾的劳动年龄段成年人的健康状况:与年龄、性别、种族、婚姻状况、教育程度和就业状况的关联。
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jul;13(3):100889. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100889. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
Epilepsy, employment and the disability discrimination act. Does legislation make a difference?癫痫、就业与《残疾歧视法》。立法有作用吗?
Seizure. 1999 Oct;8(7):412-20. doi: 10.1053/seiz.1999.0329.
9
Burden of disability in a post war birth cohort in the UK.英国战后出生队列中的残疾负担。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Jun;48(3):262-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.3.262.
10
Mental disability and discriminatory practices: effects of social representations of the Mexican population.智力残疾与歧视性做法:墨西哥人口社会表征的影响
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009 May;55(3):238-46. doi: 10.1177/0020764008093466.

引用本文的文献

1
The importance of disability representation to address implicit bias in the workplace.残疾代表性对于解决职场中隐性偏见的重要性。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Mar 22;4:1048432. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1048432. eCollection 2023.
2
Health-related educational inequalities in paid employment across 26 European countries in 2005-2014: repeated cross-sectional study.2005-2014 年 26 个欧洲国家中与健康相关的教育不平等在有偿就业中的体现:重复横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e024823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024823.

本文引用的文献

1
Has the Disability Discrimination Act closed the employment gap?《残疾歧视法》缩小了就业差距吗?
Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Oct 30;27(20):1261-6. doi: 10.1080/09638280500075626.
2
Does 'welfare-to-work' work? A systematic review of the effectiveness of the UK's welfare-to-work programmes for people with a disability or chronic illness.“从福利到工作”计划有效吗?对英国针对残疾或慢性病患者的“从福利到工作”计划的有效性进行的系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(9):1905-18. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.09.002.
3
Winners and losers in flexible labor markets: the fate of women with chronic illness in contrasting policy environments--Sweden and Britain.灵活劳动力市场中的赢家与输家:对比政策环境下慢性病女性的命运——瑞典与英国
Int J Health Serv. 2003;33(2):199-217. doi: 10.2190/UTC5-P2FJ-BTBA-0E3V.
4
Inequality in the social consequences of illness: how well do people with long-term illness fare in the British and Swedish labor markets?疾病社会后果中的不平等:慢性病患者在英国和瑞典劳动力市场中的表现如何?
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(3):435-51. doi: 10.2190/6PP1-TDEQ-H44D-4LJQ.
5
Epilepsy, employment and the disability discrimination act. Does legislation make a difference?癫痫、就业与《残疾歧视法》。立法有作用吗?
Seizure. 1999 Oct;8(7):412-20. doi: 10.1053/seiz.1999.0329.
6
Interpreting self reported limiting long term illness.解读自我报告的长期限制性疾病。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 16;311(7007):722-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7007.722.