Suppr超能文献

股骨近端肿瘤的模块化人工关节置换术。

Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur.

作者信息

Chandrasekar C R, Grimer R J, Carter S R, Tillman R M, Abudu A, Buckley L

机构信息

The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Oncology Service, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jan;91(1):108-12. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.20448.

Abstract

Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur may be required to treat primary bone tumours or destructive metastases either with impending or established pathological fracture. Modular prostheses are available off the shelf and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for this purpose. We have assessed the clinical and functional outcome of using the METS (Stanmore Implants Worldwide) modular tumour prosthesis to reconstruct the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients between 2001 and 2006. We compared the results with the published series for patients managed with modular and custom-made endoprosthetic replacements for the same conditions. There were 52 males and 48 females with a mean age of 56.3 years (16 to 84) and a mean follow-up of 24.6 months (0 to 60). In 65 patients the procedure was undertaken for metastases, in 25 for a primary bone tumour, and in ten for other malignant conditions. A total of 46 patients presented with a pathological fracture, and 19 presented with failed fixation of a previous pathological fracture. The overall patient survival was 63.6% at one year and 23.1% at five years, and was significantly better for patients with a primary bone tumour than for those with metastatic tumour (82.3% vs 53.3%, respectively at one year (p = 0.003)). There were six early dislocations of which five could be treated by closed reduction. No patient needed revision surgery for dislocation. Revision surgery was required by six (6%) patients, five for pain caused by acetabular wear and one for tumour progression. Amputation was needed in four patients for local recurrence or infection. The estimated five-year implant survival with revision as the endpoint was 90.7%. The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage score was 61% (51% to 95%). The implant survival and complications resulting from the use of the modular system were comparable to the published series of both custom-made and other modular proximal femoral implants. We conclude that at intermediate follow-up the modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur replacement provides versatility, a low incidence of implant-related complications and acceptable function for patients with metastatic tumours, pathological fractures and failed fixation of the proximal femur. It also functions as well as a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement.

摘要

对于原发骨肿瘤或具有潜在或已确诊病理性骨折的破坏性转移瘤,可能需要进行股骨近端的人工关节置换。模块化假体有现货供应,可适用于大多数此类重建情况。我们评估了2001年至2006年间连续100例使用METS(全球斯坦莫尔植入物公司)模块化肿瘤假体重建股骨近端的临床和功能结果。我们将结果与已发表的针对相同情况采用模块化和定制人工关节置换治疗的患者系列进行了比较。患者中有52名男性和48名女性,平均年龄56.3岁(16至84岁),平均随访24.6个月(0至60个月)。65例患者因转移瘤接受手术,25例因原发骨肿瘤,10例因其他恶性疾病。共有46例患者出现病理性骨折,19例之前病理性骨折内固定失败。患者1年总生存率为63.6%,5年为23.1%,原发骨肿瘤患者的生存率明显高于转移瘤患者(1年时分别为82.3%和53.3%,p = 0.003)。有6例早期脱位,其中5例可通过闭合复位治疗。没有患者因脱位需要翻修手术。6例(6%)患者需要翻修手术,5例因髋臼磨损导致疼痛,1例因肿瘤进展。4例患者因局部复发或感染需要截肢。以翻修为终点的估计5年假体生存率为90.7%。多伦多肢体挽救平均评分为61%(51%至95%)。使用模块化系统的假体生存率和并发症与已发表的定制和其他模块化股骨近端植入物系列相当。我们得出结论,在中期随访中,用于股骨近端置换的模块化肿瘤假体具有通用性,与植入物相关的并发症发生率低,对于转移瘤、病理性骨折和股骨近端内固定失败的患者具有可接受的功能。其功能与定制人工关节置换一样良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验