Hoffman Sharona, Goodman Richard A, Stier Daniel D
Case Western Reserve University School of Law, 11075 East Blvd, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Jun;3(2):117-25. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318194898d.
According to many experts, a public health emergency arising from an influenza pandemic, bioterrorism attack, or natural disaster is likely to develop in the next few years. Meeting the public health and medical response needs created by such an emergency will likely involve volunteers, health care professionals, public and private hospitals and clinics, vaccine manufacturers, governmental authorities, and many others. Conducting response activities in emergency circumstances may give rise to numerous issues of liability, and medical professionals and other potential responders have expressed concern about liability exposure. Providers may face inadequate resources, an insufficient number of qualified personnel, overwhelming demand for services, and other barriers to providing optimal treatment, which could lead to injury or even death in some cases. This article describes the different theories of liability that may be used by plaintiffs and the sources of immunity that are available to public health emergency responders in the public sector, private sector, and as volunteers. It synthesizes the existing immunity landscape and analyzes its gaps. Finally, the authors suggest consideration of the option of a comprehensive immunity provision that addresses liability protection for all health care providers during public health emergencies and that, consequently, assists in improving community emergency response efforts.
许多专家认为,未来几年可能会出现由流感大流行、生物恐怖袭击或自然灾害引发的突发公共卫生事件。应对此类事件所产生的公共卫生和医疗响应需求,可能需要志愿者、医护人员、公立和私立医院及诊所、疫苗制造商、政府当局以及其他众多方面的参与。在紧急情况下开展响应活动可能会引发诸多责任问题,医疗专业人员和其他潜在响应者已表达了对责任风险的担忧。医疗服务提供者可能面临资源不足、合格人员数量不够、服务需求过大以及提供最佳治疗的其他障碍,在某些情况下这可能导致伤害甚至死亡。本文描述了原告可能采用的不同责任理论,以及公共部门、私营部门和志愿者身份的突发公共卫生事件响应者可获得的豁免来源。它综合了现有的豁免情况并分析了其中的差距。最后,作者建议考虑采用全面豁免条款的选项,该条款应涵盖公共卫生紧急事件期间所有医护人员的责任保护,从而有助于改善社区应急响应工作。