Suppr超能文献

胃肠道息肉:内镜活检钳与切除标本之间的差异。

Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsies and resected specimens.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Feb;21(2):190-5. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283140ebd.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

An endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) carries the risk of missing the neoplastic foci within a polyp as only a small portion of the lesion is sampled using this technique. Accordingly, the histological examination of specimens obtained by an EFB is of limited accuracy and patient management based on the histological findings is controversial. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the diagnostic concordance between an EFB and resected tissues of gastric and colon polyps.

METHODS

Between January 2006 and October 2007, 1312 gastrointestinal polyps from 896 patients were resected in our hospital. Patients with polyps of epithelial origin of at least 8 mm in diameter and not associated with polyposis syndromes were included in the study. Polyps of nonepithelial origin were excluded. One thousand two hundred and sixty-four polyps of epithelial origin [gastric polyps (n=268) and colon polyps (n=996)] obtained from 813 patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients underwent an EFB and resection of the polyp by endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

RESULTS

Multiple polyps existed in 31.6% of the patients. The pathological diagnoses of resected gastric polyps were as follows: adenomas with low-grade dysplasia, 46 (17.2%); adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, 42 (15.7%); hyperplastic polyps, 126 (47.0%); chronic inflammatory polyps, 29 (10.8%); and adenocarcinomas, 25 (9.3%). The discrepancy rate between an EFB and the pathology of the resected gastric polyps was 39.2% (the Kendall's tau-b and the kappa coefficient for agreement between the EFB and resected specimens of gastric polyps were 0.577 and 0.472, respectively; P value <0.001). No relationship between the size of the gastric polyp and the concordance rate was observed. The pathological diagnoses of the resected colon polyps were as follows: adenomas with low-grade dysplasia, 559 (56.1%); adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, 229 (23.0%); hyperplastic polyps, 44 (4.4%); adenocarcinomas, 53 (5.3%); and inflammatory polyps, 111 (11.1%). The discrepancy rate between the EFB and the pathology of the resected colon polyps was 39.8%. (the Kendall's tau-b and the kappa coefficient for agreement between the EFB and the resected specimens of the colon polyps were 0.479 and 0.293, respectively; P value <0.001). No relationship between the size of the colon polyp and the concordance rate was observed.

CONCLUSION

Considerable discrepancies were observed in histological findings between the EFB and the resected specimens. Therefore, complete removal of the entire polyp is recommended to confirm the diagnosis, to remove precancerous lesions, and to develop an optimal management plan.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜下钳夹活检(EFB)存在漏检息肉内肿瘤病灶的风险,因为这种技术仅对病变的一小部分进行采样。因此,EFB 获得的标本的组织学检查准确性有限,基于组织学发现的患者管理存在争议。本前瞻性研究旨在确定 EFB 与胃和结肠息肉切除组织之间的诊断一致性。

方法

2006 年 1 月至 2007 年 10 月,我院共切除 896 例患者的 1312 个胃肠道息肉。纳入研究的患者为直径至少 8 毫米的上皮来源息肉且不伴有息肉病综合征。排除非上皮来源的息肉。813 例患者的 1264 个上皮来源的息肉(胃息肉 268 个,结肠息肉 996 个)符合纳入标准。所有患者均接受 EFB 和内镜黏膜切除术、内镜黏膜下剥离术切除息肉。

结果

31.6%的患者存在多个息肉。胃息肉切除的病理诊断如下:低级别异型增生腺瘤 46 例(17.2%);高级别异型增生腺瘤 42 例(15.7%);增生性息肉 126 例(47.0%);慢性炎性息肉 29 例(10.8%);腺癌 25 例(9.3%)。EFB 与胃息肉切除标本的病理差异率为 39.2%(EFB 和胃息肉切除标本之间的 Kendall's tau-b 和一致性kappa 系数分别为 0.577 和 0.472,P 值均<0.001)。未观察到胃息肉大小与一致性率之间存在相关性。结肠息肉切除的病理诊断如下:低级别异型增生腺瘤 559 例(56.1%);高级别异型增生腺瘤 229 例(23.0%);增生性息肉 44 例(4.4%);腺癌 53 例(5.3%);炎性息肉 111 例(11.1%)。EFB 与结肠息肉切除标本的病理差异率为 39.8%(EFB 和结肠息肉切除标本之间的 Kendall's tau-b 和一致性 kappa 系数分别为 0.479 和 0.293,P 值均<0.001)。未观察到结肠息肉大小与一致性率之间存在相关性。

结论

EFB 与切除标本的组织学发现存在显著差异。因此,建议完整切除整个息肉以明确诊断、切除癌前病变并制定最佳治疗方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验