Langhammer Christopher G, Garg Karan, Neubauer Judith A, Rosenthal Susan, Kinzy Terri Goss
UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
J Investig Med. 2009 Jan;57(1):11-7. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e3181946fec.
The falling percentage of doctors of medicine applying for National Institute of Health-funded research grants is 1 indicator that physician-scientists are a disappearing breed. This is occurring at a time when increased translational, disease-oriented, patient-oriented, and clinical research are national goals. One of the keys to providing sufficient numbers of physician-scientists to support this goal is the active targeting of medical students. We hypothesize that an improved research program infrastructure and responsiveness to changing student needs will increase student participation in research-oriented electives.
We have developed a student research program consisting of 2 Students Interested in Research noncredit electives (lecture and laboratory based), summer fellowships, support for year-out fellowships, and a Distinction in Research program that spans undergraduate medical education. Student participation and short-term research outcomes from fall 2004 through spring 2008 are analyzed to examine program efficacy.
Students involved in the early parts of the program initially experienced higher application and success rates for summer funding opportunities, but as the program has matured, these rates have fallen in line with the class average. Independently, students participating in later portions of the program increasingly submit or publish a first author paper and have taken a year off for research during medical school. Overlap of participation in the programs is generally smaller than expected.
Although structured programs can provide step-wise research experiences of increasing intensity, students may not experience a training pipeline in which each stage relies on those before and after, and instead may sample an a la carte selection of research-based enrichment opportunities.
申请美国国立卫生研究院资助研究经费的医学博士比例不断下降,这表明临床科研人员正在日益减少。而此时,加强转化医学、疾病导向、患者导向及临床研究已成为国家目标。为实现这一目标提供足够数量临床科研人员的关键之一,是积极吸引医学生参与。我们推测,改善研究项目基础设施并更好地响应学生不断变化的需求,将增加学生参与研究导向选修课的比例。
我们制定了一个学生研究项目,包括两门面向对研究感兴趣学生的非学分选修课(讲座和实验课)、暑期奖学金、全年奖学金支持以及贯穿本科医学教育的研究卓越项目。分析了2004年秋季至2008年春季期间学生的参与情况和短期研究成果,以检验项目效果。
参与该项目早期阶段的学生,最初在暑期资助机会的申请和成功率方面较高,但随着项目的成熟,这些比率已降至班级平均水平。独立来看,参与项目后期阶段的学生越来越多地提交或发表第一作者论文,并在医学院期间休学一年进行研究。各项目参与的重叠度通常比预期的要小。
尽管结构化项目可以提供强度不断增加的逐步研究体验,但学生可能不会经历一个每个阶段都依赖前后阶段的培训流程,相反,他们可能会像点菜一样选择各种基于研究的丰富机会。