Suppr超能文献

咬合记录材料垂直精度的评估。

Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials.

作者信息

Ghazal Muhamad, Ludwig Klaus, Habil Rer Nat, Kern Matthias

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics, and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2008 Oct;39(9):727-32.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 4 interocclusal recording materials for their ability to reproduce accurately interocclusal relationships after a storage time of 1 or 48 hours.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A custom-made metal apparatus was used to simulate the maxilla and mandible. The vertical discrepancies were measured by a precision dial gauge. Eight inter-occlusal records were made in each of the following groups: (G1) Futar D (polyvinyl siloxane; Kettenbach), (G2) Ramitec (polyether; 3M ESPE), (G3) LuxaBite (composite resin based on bisacryl; DMG), (G4) Aluwax (aluminum wax; Aluwax Dental Products), (G5) LuxaBite corrected with LuxaBite, and (G6) LuxaBite corrected with Aluwax. The vertical discrepancies were measured after storage of the records for 1 and 48 hours at room temperature and repositioning of the records in the metal apparatus. Data were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance followed by the Games-Howell test (P < or = .05).

RESULTS

After storage times of 1 and 48 hours, respectively, the mean vertical discrepancies (microm) for G1 (23/33) and G2 (25/30) were statistically significantly lower than for G3 (431/745) and G4 (110/151) (P < .05) but higher than for G5 (8/16) and G6 (7/17). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 or between G5 and G6 for either measurement.

CONCLUSION

These vertical discrepancies increased after a storage time of 48 hours. However, correction of the LuxaBite records with LuxaBite or Aluwax showed significantly lower vertical discrepancies than all other materials. Clinically, the vertical discrepancies the corrected records caused could be insignificant.

摘要

目的

评估4种牙合间记录材料在储存1小时或48小时后准确重现牙合间关系的能力。

方法和材料

使用定制的金属装置模拟上颌和下颌。用精密百分表测量垂直差异。在以下每组中制作8份牙合间记录:(G1)Futar D(聚乙烯基硅氧烷;Kettenbach公司),(G2)Ramitec(聚醚;3M ESPE公司),(G3)LuxaBite(基于双丙烯酸酯的复合树脂;DMG公司),(G4)Aluwax(铝蜡;Aluwax牙科产品公司),(G5)用LuxaBite校正的LuxaBite,以及(G6)用Aluwax校正的LuxaBite。在室温下将记录储存1小时和48小时,并将记录重新放置在金属装置中后测量垂直差异。使用单因素方差分析,随后进行Games-Howell检验(P≤0.05)对数据进行统计学分析。

结果

在分别储存1小时和48小时后,G1组(23/33)和G2组(25/30)的平均垂直差异(微米)在统计学上显著低于G3组(431/745)和G4组(110/151)(P<0.05),但高于G5组(8/16)和G6组(7/17)。对于任何一种测量,G1组和G2组之间或G5组和G6组之间均无统计学显著差异。

结论

在储存48小时后,这些垂直差异增加。然而,用LuxaBite或Aluwax校正LuxaBite记录显示出比所有其他材料显著更低的垂直差异。临床上,校正记录所导致的垂直差异可能微不足道。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验