• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factors associated with first-fill adherence rates for diabetic medications: a cohort study.糖尿病药物首次填充依从率的相关因素:一项队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):233-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0870-z. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
2
Lower copay and oral administration: predictors of first-fill adherence to new asthma prescriptions.较低的自付费用和口服给药:新哮喘处方首次配药依从性的预测因素。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2009 Jun;2(4):174-80.
3
Integrating E-Prescribing and Pharmacy Claims Data for Predictive Modeling: Comparing Costs and Utilization of Health Plan Members Who Fill Their Initial Medications with Those Who Do Not.整合电子处方和药房理赔数据进行预测建模:比较初始用药者和非初始用药者的健康计划成员的成本和使用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1282-1290. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1282.
4
Demographic and Clinical Profiles of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Initiating Canagliflozin Versus DPP-4 Inhibitors in a Large U.S. Managed Care Population.在一个大型美国管理式医疗人群中,起始用卡格列净与 DPP-4 抑制剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的人口统计学和临床特征。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1204-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1204.
5
Evaluating the relationship between quality measure adherence definitions and economic outcomes in commercial health plans: a retrospective diabetes cohort study.评估商业健康计划中质量衡量标准遵守情况的定义与经济结果之间的关系:一项回顾性糖尿病队列研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):64-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.1.064.
6
Linking Electronic Health Record Prescribing Data and Pharmacy Dispensing Records to Identify Patient-Level Factors Associated With Psychotropic Medication Receipt: Retrospective Study.链接电子健康记录处方数据和药房配药记录以识别与接受精神药物治疗相关的患者层面因素:回顾性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Mar 4;13:e63740. doi: 10.2196/63740.
7
Prescription fill rates for acute and chronic medications in claims-EMR linked data.索赔-电子病历关联数据中急性和慢性药物的处方填充率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(44):e13110. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013110.
8
Evaluating the Impact of Sample Medication on Subsequent Patient Adherence.评估样本药物对后续患者依从性的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Nov;22(11):1262-1269. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.11.1262.
9
Descriptive analysis of mail interventions with physicians and patients to improve adherence with antihypertensive and antidiabetic medications in a mixed-model managed care organization of commercial and Medicare members.在一个由商业保险和医疗保险成员组成的混合模式管理式医疗组织中,对针对医生和患者的邮件干预措施进行描述性分析,以提高抗高血压和抗糖尿病药物的依从性。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Jun;17(5):355-66. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.5.355.
10
Evaluation of an outpatient pharmacy clinical services program on adherence and clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes and/or coronary artery disease.评估门诊药房临床服务项目对糖尿病和/或冠状动脉疾病患者依从性及临床结局的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Oct;20(10):1036-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.10.1036.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated versus manual prior authorization for diabetes mellitus drugs: A retrospective study from Israel.糖尿病药物自动与手动预先授权:一项来自以色列的回顾性研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Sep 28;9:20552076231203889. doi: 10.1177/20552076231203889. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Prevalence and predictors of primary nonadherence to medications prescribed in primary care.初级保健中开具的药物原发性不依从的流行率和预测因素。
CMAJ. 2023 Aug 8;195(30):E1000-E1009. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.221018.
3
Not obtaining a medication the first time it is prescribed: primary non-adherence to cardiovascular pharmacotherapy.首次未获得处方药物:心血管药物治疗的主要不依从性。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Aug;113(8):1103-1116. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02230-3. Epub 2023 May 20.
4
Pediatric Medication Noninitiation in Spain.西班牙的儿科药物起始治疗率
Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-034371.
5
Combining patient reported outcomes and EHR data to understand population level treatment needs: correcting for selection bias in the migraine signature study.结合患者报告的结果和电子健康记录数据以了解人群层面的治疗需求:校正偏头痛特征研究中的选择偏倚。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Dec 18;5(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00401-2.
6
Applying the Social-Ecological Approach to Evaluate Diabetes Medication Management in Older People.应用社会生态学方法评估老年人的糖尿病药物管理。
Sr Care Pharm. 2021 Nov 1;36(11):548-555. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2021.548.
7
Factors associated with primary nonadherence to newly initiated direct oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.与非瓣膜性心房颤动患者新起始直接口服抗凝剂原发性不依从相关的因素。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9):1210-1220. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.9.1210.
8
Diabetes medication regimens and patient clinical characteristics in the national patient-centered clinical research network, PCORnet.国家以患者为中心的临床研究网络(PCORnet)中的糖尿病药物治疗方案和患者临床特征。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Oct;8(5):e00637. doi: 10.1002/prp2.637.
9
Assessment of diabetic patients' adherence to insulin injections on basal-bolus regimen in diabetic care center in Saudi Arabia 2018: Cross sectional survey.2018年沙特阿拉伯糖尿病护理中心糖尿病患者对基础-餐时胰岛素注射方案依从性的评估:横断面调查
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):1964-1970. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_276_19.
10
Primary nonadherence to chronic disease medications: a meta-analysis.慢性病药物治疗的原发性不依从性:一项荟萃分析。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 7;12:721-731. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S161151. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of increased patient cost sharing on socioeconomic disparities in health care.增加患者自付费用对医疗保健中社会经济差异的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Aug;23(8):1131-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0614-0. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
2
Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification.糖尿病患者为何未达到推荐的风险因素目标?是依从性差还是缺乏强化治疗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):588-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0554-8. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
3
Importance of therapy intensification and medication nonadherence for blood pressure control in patients with coronary disease.强化治疗和药物治疗不依从对冠心病患者血压控制的重要性。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Feb 11;168(3):271-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.72.
4
Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews.患者对医疗治疗的依从性:综述之综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 17;7:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-55.
5
The importance of medication adherence in improving chronic-disease related outcomes: what we know and what we need to further know.药物依从性对改善慢性病相关结局的重要性:我们已知的和需要进一步了解的内容。
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):517-20. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000166617.68751.5f.
6
Clinical outcomes and adherence to medications measured by claims data in patients with diabetes.通过理赔数据衡量糖尿病患者的临床结局及药物依从性。
Diabetes Care. 2004 Dec;27(12):2800-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.12.2800.
7
Variations in patients' adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research.患者对医疗建议的依从性差异:对50年研究的定量综述
Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):200-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9.
8
Effects of an increase in patient copayments on medical service demands of the insured in Japan.患者自付费用增加对日本参保者医疗服务需求的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Summer;19(3):465-75. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000400.
9
Medication costs, adherence, and health outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的药物成本、依从性和健康结果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Aug;22(4):220-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.4.220.
10
Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review.提高患者对药物处方依从性的干预措施:科学综述
JAMA. 2002 Dec 11;288(22):2868-79. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2868.

糖尿病药物首次填充依从率的相关因素:一项队列研究。

Factors associated with first-fill adherence rates for diabetic medications: a cohort study.

作者信息

Shah Nirav R, Hirsch Annemarie G, Zacker Christopher, Taylor Scott, Wood G Craig, Stewart Walter F

机构信息

Center for Health Research, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA 17822, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):233-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0870-z. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-008-0870-z
PMID:19093157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2629003/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about first-fill adherence rates for diabetic medications and factors associated with non-fill.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the proportion of patients who fill their initial prescription for a diabetes medication, understand characteristics associated with prescription first-fill rates, and examine the effect of first-fill rates on subsequent A1c levels.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cohort study linking electronic health records and pharmacy claims.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand one hundred thirty-two patients over the age of 18 who sought care from the Geisinger Clinic, had Geisinger Health Plan pharmacy benefits, and were prescribed a diabetes medication for the first time between 2002 and 2006.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome of interest was naïve prescription filled by the patient within 30 days of the prescription order date.

RESULTS

The overall first-fill adherence rate for antidiabetic drugs was 85%. Copays < $10 (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.57-3.14) and baseline A1c > 9% (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.35, 5.09) were associated with improved first-fill rates while sex, age, and co-morbidity score had no association. A1c levels decreased among both filling and non-filling patients though significantly greater reductions were observed among filling patients. Biguanides and sulfonylureas had higher first-fill rates than second-line oral agents or insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

First-fill rates for diabetes medication have room for improvement. Several factors that predict non-filling are readily identifiable and should be considered as possible targets for interventions.

摘要

背景

关于糖尿病药物首次配药依从率以及与未配药相关的因素,人们了解甚少。

目的

评估首次开具糖尿病药物处方的患者配药比例,了解与处方首次配药率相关的特征,并研究首次配药率对后续糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平的影响。

设计

将电子健康记录与药房报销数据相联系的回顾性队列研究。

参与者

1132名年龄在18岁以上的患者,他们在盖辛格诊所就诊,享受盖辛格健康计划药房福利,并于2002年至2006年期间首次被开具糖尿病药物处方。

测量指标

主要关注的结果是患者在处方开具日期后的30天内配药。

结果

抗糖尿病药物的总体首次配药依从率为85%。自付费用低于10美元(比值比[OR]为2.22,95%置信区间[CI]为1.57 - 3.14)以及基线糖化血红蛋白水平>9%(OR为2.63,95% CI为1.35,5.09)与首次配药率提高相关,而性别、年龄和合并症评分则无关联。无论配药与否,患者的糖化血红蛋白水平均有所下降,但配药患者的下降幅度明显更大。双胍类药物和磺脲类药物的首次配药率高于二线口服药物或胰岛素。

结论

糖尿病药物的首次配药率有提升空间。一些可预测未配药情况的因素易于识别,应被视为可能的干预目标。