• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术中肌瘤切除术

Myomectomy during cesarean section.

作者信息

Li Hui, Du Juan, Jin Liangyi, Shi Zhan, Liu Mingying

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):183-6. doi: 10.1080/00016340802635526.

DOI:10.1080/00016340802635526
PMID:19093235
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of myomectomy during cesarean section (CS). Design. Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral university hospital.

POPULATION AND METHODS

A study group of 1,242 pregnant women with fibromyomas who underwent myomectomy during CS and three control groups of 200 matched pregnant women without fibromyomas who underwent CS deliveries (Group A), 145 patients with fibromyomas who underwent CS deliveries without removal of fibromyomas (Group B) and 51 patients with fibromyomas who had a hysterectomy during CS (Group C).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The difference between pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels, the incidence of hemorrhage, blood transfusion, postoperative fever, duration of operation and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

No difference was found in the median parity or mean gestational age, but maternal age was higher and the gestational age lower in Group C than the study group. The median number and diameter of fibromyomas in Group B were lower than in the study group. Compared to the study group, Group B women had more single fibromyomas, while those in Group C had more multiple fibromyomas. Group B had more uterine cornual fibromyomas than the study group. There were no differences in the mean hemoglobin change, the incidence of postoperative fever and the length of hospital stay among groups.

CONCLUSION

Myomectomy during CS was a safe and an effective procedure.

摘要

目的

评估剖宫产术中肌瘤切除术的安全性和有效性。设计:回顾性病例对照研究。

地点

三级转诊大学医院。

研究对象与方法

研究组为1242例患有纤维瘤的孕妇,她们在剖宫产术中接受了肌瘤切除术;三个对照组分别为200例匹配的未患纤维瘤的孕妇,她们接受了剖宫产分娩(A组);145例患有纤维瘤的患者,她们接受了剖宫产分娩但未切除纤维瘤(B组);51例患有纤维瘤的患者,她们在剖宫产术中接受了子宫切除术(C组)。

主要观察指标

术前和术后血红蛋白水平的差异、出血发生率、输血情况、术后发热、手术时间和住院时间。

结果

各组间中位产次或平均孕周无差异,但C组产妇年龄高于研究组,孕周低于研究组。B组纤维瘤的中位数量和直径低于研究组。与研究组相比,B组女性单发性纤维瘤更多,而C组多发性纤维瘤更多。B组子宫角部纤维瘤比研究组更多。各组间平均血红蛋白变化、术后发热发生率和住院时间无差异。

结论

剖宫产术中肌瘤切除术是一种安全有效的手术。

相似文献

1
Myomectomy during cesarean section.剖宫产术中肌瘤切除术
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):183-6. doi: 10.1080/00016340802635526.
2
Uterine artery ligation for treatment of pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas who are undergoing cesarean section.剖宫产术中子宫动脉结扎术治疗合并子宫平滑肌瘤的孕妇。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Aug;86(2):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.027. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
3
Myomectomy during cesarean section: a safe procedure?剖宫产术中肌瘤切除术:一种安全的手术吗?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Dec;1092:408-13. doi: 10.1196/annals.1365.038.
4
Safety of cesarean myomectomy.剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术的安全性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Oct;35(5):906-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01121.x.
5
Bilateral ascending uterine artery ligation vs. tourniquet use for hemostasis in cesarean myomectomy. A comparison.剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术中双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎与使用止血带止血的比较
J Reprod Med. 2003 Dec;48(12):950-4.
6
Uterine artery occlusion and myomectomy for treatment of pregnant women with uterine leiomyomas who are undergoing cesarean section.剖宫产术中子宫动脉阻断及肌瘤切除术治疗合并子宫肌瘤的孕妇
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Apr;36(2):284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01158.x.
7
[Myomectomy during cesarean section].剖宫产术中肌瘤切除术
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1999;38(2):7-9.
8
Caesarean myomectomy.剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术
Afr J Reprod Health. 2002 Dec;6(3):38-43.
9
Risk factors for complications in patients undergoing myomectomy at the time of cesarean section.剖宫产时行子宫肌瘤切除术患者并发症的危险因素。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Jun;36(3):550-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01195.x.
10
Endometrial myomectomy: a novel surgical method during cesarean section.剖宫产术中子宫内膜肌瘤切除术:一种新型手术方法
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Feb;31(4):433-438. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1286320. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflections on Postpartum Hysterectomy as a Possible Complication of Cesarean Myomectomy: A Long Debate.关于剖宫产子宫肌瘤剔除术可能的并发症——产后子宫切除术的思考:一场漫长的争论
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 4;60(4):594. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040594.
2
A case of incarcerated gravid uterus with a history of cesarean section was a good candidate for manual reduction: A case report.一例有剖宫产史的嵌顿妊娠子宫病例是手法复位的良好适应证:病例报告。
Clin Case Rep. 2020 Nov 12;9(1):322-325. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.3524. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Myomectomy at cesarean section: A safe option.
剖宫产时行子宫肌瘤切除术:一种安全的选择。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Dec;72(Suppl 1):S161-S163. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 May 7.
4
Comparative Study of Cesarean Myomectomy with Abdominal Myomectomy in Terms of Blood Loss in Single Fibroid.单发性子宫肌瘤行剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术与经腹子宫肌瘤切除术失血情况的比较研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Aug;66(4):287-91. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0685-x. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
5
The utility of caesarean myomectomy as a safe procedure: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases with review of literature.剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术作为一种安全手术的效用:21例病例回顾性分析及文献复习
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):OC05-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8630.4795. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
The safety of cesarean myomectomy in women with large myomas.患有大肌瘤的女性行剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术的安全性。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014 Sep;57(5):367-72. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.5.367. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
7
Myomectomy during Caesarean Birth in Fibroid-Endemic, Low-Resource Settings.肌瘤高发、资源匮乏地区剖宫产术中的肌瘤切除术
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:520834. doi: 10.1155/2013/520834. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
8
Caesarean Myomectomy: Feasibility and safety.剖宫产子宫肌瘤切除术:可行性与安全性
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 May;12(2):190-6. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
9
At times, myomectomy is mandatory to effect delivery.有时,肌瘤切除术对于实现分娩是必要的。
Ann Surg Innov Res. 2011 Oct 28;5(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1750-1164-5-9.