Gurwitz Jerry H, Field Terry S, Rochon Paula, Judge James, Harrold Leslie R, Bell Chaim M, Lee Monica, White Kathleen, LaPrino Jane, Erramuspe-Mainard Janet, DeFlorio Martin, Gavendo Linda, Baril Joann L, Reed George, Bates David W
Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Fallon Clinic, and Fallon Community Health Plan, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2225-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02004.x.
To evaluate the efficacy of computerized provider order entry with clinical decision support for preventing adverse drug events in long-term care.
Cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Two large long-term care facilities.
One thousand one hundred eighteen long-term care residents of 29 resident care units.
The 29 resident care units, each with computerized provider order entry, were randomized to having a clinical decision support system (intervention units) or not (control units).
The number of adverse drug events, severity of events, and whether the events were preventable.
Within intervention units, 411 adverse drug events occurred over 3,803 resident-months of observation time; 152 (37.0%) were deemed preventable. Within control units, there were 340 adverse drug events over 3,257 resident-months of observation time; 126 (37.1%) were characterized as preventable. There were 10.8 adverse drug events per 100 resident-months and 4.0 preventable events per 100 resident-months on intervention units. There were 10.4 adverse drug events per 100 resident-months and 3.9 preventable events per 100 resident-months on control units. Comparing intervention and control units, the adjusted rate ratios were 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.92-1.23) for all adverse drug events and 1.02 (95% CI=0.81-1.30) for preventable adverse drug events.
Computerized provider order entry with decision support did not reduce the adverse drug event rate or preventable adverse drug event rate in the long-term care setting. Alert burden, limited scope of the alerts, and a need to more fully integrate clinical and laboratory information may have affected efficacy.
评估计算机医嘱录入系统结合临床决策支持系统在预防长期护理机构中药物不良事件的疗效。
整群随机对照试验。
两家大型长期护理机构。
29个居住护理单元的1118名长期护理居民。
29个居住护理单元,每个单元均配备计算机医嘱录入系统,被随机分为使用临床决策支持系统(干预单元)或不使用(对照单元)。
药物不良事件的数量、事件的严重程度以及事件是否可预防。
在干预单元,在3803个居民观察月期间共发生411起药物不良事件;其中152起(37.0%)被认为是可预防的。在对照单元,在3257个居民观察月期间有340起药物不良事件;其中126起(37.1%)被认定为可预防的。干预单元每100个居民观察月有10.8起药物不良事件,每100个居民观察月有4.0起可预防事件。对照单元每100个居民观察月有10.4起药物不良事件,每100个居民观察月有3.9起可预防事件。比较干预单元和对照单元,所有药物不良事件的调整率比为1.06(95%置信区间(CI)=0.92 - 1.23),可预防药物不良事件的调整率比为1.02(95% CI = 0.81 - 1.30)。
计算机医嘱录入系统结合决策支持系统在长期护理环境中并未降低药物不良事件发生率或可预防药物不良事件发生率。警报负担、警报范围有限以及临床和实验室信息需要更充分整合可能影响了疗效。