Brochier M L, Raynaud P, Rioux P, Charbonnier B, Desveaux B, Pacouret G
Cardiology Department, University Hospital Trousseau, Tours, France.
Am J Cardiol. 1991 Sep 3;68(7):105B-109B. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90392-x.
Pathophysiology of unstable angina involves spasm, plaque rupture, activation of platelets, and coagulation. The incidence and frequency of intracoronary thrombus formation are presently under active assessment in order to establish the potential benefit of thrombolytic therapy. A preliminary study was conducted in patients admitted in our coronary care unit for unstable angina with typical clinical and electrocardiographic criteria and with early coronary angiogram. After exclusion of 4 patients with left main coronary stenosis or contraindications for thrombolysis, 16 patients received thrombolytic infusion and 14 underwent a second coronary angiogram. Seven patients had an intracoronary thrombus (6 nonocclusive, 1 occlusive) and at the second angiogram only 3 nonocclusive thrombi were modified (1 disappeared, 2 were reduced). Moreover, the quantitative Coronary Angiography Analysis System (CAAS) in the 11 cases suitable for analysis did not show any significant changes, especially in the Ambrose type IIB lesions. In-hospital clinical outcome was not influenced by thrombolytic therapy (5 ischemic recurrences, 1 fatal myocardial infarction, 4 emergency and 4 elective revascularization procedures). This short series is in agreement with the literature data. Only one third of patients with active unstable angina remains refractory to conventional therapy. The transient benefit of thrombolysis is limited to patients with demonstrated intracoronary thrombi. Clinical or angiographic improvement are not always in correlation and until now do not seem able to prevent short-term recurrences or the need for revascularization procedures.
不稳定型心绞痛的病理生理学涉及痉挛、斑块破裂、血小板活化和凝血。目前正在积极评估冠状动脉内血栓形成的发生率和频率,以确定溶栓治疗的潜在益处。对入住我们冠心病监护病房、符合典型临床和心电图标准且早期进行冠状动脉造影的不稳定型心绞痛患者进行了一项初步研究。在排除4例左主干冠状动脉狭窄或有溶栓禁忌证的患者后,16例患者接受了溶栓输注,14例患者接受了第二次冠状动脉造影。7例患者存在冠状动脉内血栓(6例非闭塞性,1例闭塞性),在第二次血管造影时,仅3例非闭塞性血栓有变化(1例消失,2例缩小)。此外,在适合分析的11例病例中,定量冠状动脉造影分析系统(CAAS)未显示任何显著变化,尤其是在安布罗斯IIB型病变中。溶栓治疗对住院期间的临床结局无影响(5例缺血复发,1例致命性心肌梗死,4例急诊和4例择期血运重建手术)。这个简短的系列与文献数据一致。只有三分之一的活动性不稳定型心绞痛患者对传统治疗无效。溶栓的短暂益处仅限于已证实有冠状动脉内血栓的患者。临床或血管造影改善并不总是相关的,到目前为止,似乎无法预防短期复发或避免血运重建手术的必要性。