Suppr超能文献

提供针灸服务的普通诊所转诊率和处方成本是否较低?一项初步调查。

Do general practices which provide an acupuncture service have low referral rates and prescription costs? A pilot survey.

作者信息

Johnson Gina, White Adrian, Livingstone Ruth

机构信息

Stopsley Group Practice, Churchfield Medical Centre, Luton, UK.

出版信息

Acupunct Med. 2008 Dec;26(4):205-13. doi: 10.1136/aim.26.4.205.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies by individual acupuncture practitioners have given an indication that offering acupuncture in primary care may reduce the need for referral to secondary care and reduce the costs of prescriptions. It would be informative to find out whether these findings can be supported by data from other practices. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of surveying national data on referrals and prescribing.

METHODS

Three primary care trusts (PCTs) were selected, and all practices within each trust were sent an email asking whether any member of the primary care team offered acupuncture, and if so how many appointments per week. Data on rates of referral to orthopaedic, physiotherapy, pain and rheumatology clinics were then sought from the PCT, both for the practices offering acupuncture and for the PCT as a whole. Similarly, data on costs of prescriptions for non-steroidal (NSAID) and non-opioid analgesic drugs were obtained from the Prescription Pricing Authority.

RESULTS

Out of the 109 practices surveyed, a total of 14 (13%) offered acupuncture services to some extent. There was wide variation in provision between the different PCTs. The eight practices which offered at least one appointment per week for every 2000 registered patients were included in the analysis. The mean values (and SDs) for the three PCTs and for the eight acupuncture practices, respectively, were as follows: for referral to various clinics: orthopaedic 32.3 (16.2) and 27.4 (10.87); pain clinic 1.6 (1.3) and 2.8 (1.6); physiotherapy 13.4 (14.5) and 29.5 (10.0); and rheumatology 4.7 (2.3) and 6.4 (3.0). The mean values for costs of non-opioid analgesics were pound1820 ( pound442) and pound2008 ( pound762); and for NSAIDs were pound4148 ( pound269) and pound4476 ( pound1366), respectively. There were no trends towards a reduction of clinic referral or prescription costs.

CONCLUSIONS

We have conducted the first survey of the effects of provision of acupuncture in UK general practice, using data provided by the NHS, and uncovered a wide variation in the availability of the service in different areas. We have been unable to demonstrate any consistent differences in the prescribing or referral rates that could be due to the use of acupuncture in these practices. The wide variation in the data means that if such a trend exists, a very large survey would be needed to identify it. However, we discovered inaccuracies and variations in presentation of data by the PCTs which have made the numerical input, and hence our results, unreliable. Thus the practicalities of access to data and the problems with data accuracy would preclude a nationwide survey.

摘要

背景

个体针灸从业者的研究表明,在初级医疗保健中提供针灸治疗可能会减少转至二级医疗保健的需求,并降低处方成本。了解这些发现是否能得到其他医疗机构数据的支持将很有意义。本研究的目的是测试调查全国转诊和开处方数据的可行性。

方法

选择了三个初级医疗保健信托基金(PCT),并向每个信托基金内的所有医疗机构发送电子邮件,询问初级医疗团队的任何成员是否提供针灸治疗,如果提供,每周有多少预约。然后从PCT获取转诊至骨科、物理治疗、疼痛和风湿病诊所的比率数据,包括提供针灸治疗的医疗机构和整个PCT的相关数据。同样,从处方定价机构获取非甾体(NSAID)和非阿片类镇痛药的处方成本数据。

结果

在接受调查的109家医疗机构中,共有14家(13%)在一定程度上提供针灸服务。不同PCT之间的服务提供情况差异很大。分析纳入了每周为每2000名注册患者至少提供一次预约的8家医疗机构。三个PCT和8家针灸医疗机构的平均值(及标准差)分别如下:转诊至各诊所:骨科32.3(16.2)和27.4(10.87);疼痛诊所1.6(1.3)和2.8(1.6);物理治疗13.4(14.5)和29.5(10.0);风湿病科4.7(2.3)和6.4(3.0)。非阿片类镇痛药的平均成本分别为1820英镑(442英镑)和2008英镑(762英镑);NSAIDs的平均成本分别为4148英镑(269英镑)和4476英镑(1366英镑)。诊所转诊或处方成本没有下降趋势。

结论

我们利用英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)提供的数据,首次对英国全科医疗中提供针灸治疗的效果进行了调查,发现不同地区该服务的可及性差异很大。我们未能证明这些医疗机构因使用针灸治疗而在处方或转诊率上存在任何一致的差异。数据的巨大差异意味着,如果存在这样的趋势,需要进行非常大规模的调查才能识别出来。然而,我们发现PCT提供的数据存在不准确和呈现方式的差异,这使得数值输入以及我们的结果不可靠。因此,获取数据的实际情况和数据准确性问题将使全国性调查无法进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验