Chadwick Jeffrey W, Prentice Ricarda N, Major Paul W, Lam Ernest W N
Faculty of Dentistry, the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jan;107(1):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.025.
The magnification and distortion of images made from scanning and nonscanning CCD cephalometric systems was evaluated.
Acrylic box and dry human skull phantoms were imaged using a conventional cephalostat, the nonscanning Kodak 8000C, the horizontally scanning GE/Instrumentarium OC100D, and the vertically scanning Sirona OrthophosDS. True linear and angular measurements of the phantoms were made using a coordinate measuring system and the Hitachi MercuRay cone beam system. The accuracy of linear and angular measurements was assessed, as were magnification and distortion, where appropriate.
Statistically significant differences between linear and angular measurements were found for almost all measurements for both phantoms. In general, the conventional cephalostat and Sirona OrthophosDS systems produced the greatest magnification and distortion while the GE/Instrumentarium OC 100D and Kodak 8000C systems, the least.
Measurement differences related to the beam geometries of these systems could not be predicted a priori. Unaccounted for, these differences could result in clinically significant consequences.
评估扫描式和非扫描式电荷耦合器件(CCD)头颅测量系统所成图像的放大率和失真情况。
使用传统头颅定位仪、非扫描式柯达8000C、水平扫描的通用电气/依诺森泰OC100D以及垂直扫描的西诺德OrthophosDS对头骨丙烯酸盒和干燥人体头骨模型进行成像。使用坐标测量系统和日立MercuRay锥形束系统对头骨模型进行真实的线性和角度测量。评估线性和角度测量的准确性以及在适当情况下的放大率和失真情况。
对于两种头骨模型的几乎所有测量,线性和角度测量之间均发现具有统计学意义的差异。总体而言,传统头颅定位仪和西诺德OrthophosDS系统产生的放大率和失真最大,而通用电气/依诺森泰OC100D和柯达8000C系统产生的最小。
与这些系统的射束几何形状相关的测量差异无法事先预测。若不加以考虑,这些差异可能会导致具有临床意义的后果。