Rudd J, Glanz K
Arizona State University, Tempe.
Public Health Rep. 1991 Sep-Oct;106(5):517-23.
A study that assessed newspaper coverage of the 1986 Hospital Mortality Data for Medicare Patients released by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is described. Media interpretation of Federal information about the quality of hospital medical care is also discussed. A sample of 68 articles from newspapers serving urban areas of various sizes in all regions of the United States was analyzed. Articles were coded into classifications according to how the news was played, headline bias (positive-negative-neutral), hospital mentions, quote sources, explanations for excessively high mortality rates, urban area population, and geographic region. The findings indicated that HCFA's release of the 1986 hospital mortality data received heavy news coverage. There were twice as many negative headlines as positive ones, although nearly 95 percent of the hospitals had mortality rates within expected ranges. Quotes from representatives of hospitals predominated in the newspaper articles, and they often blamed some aspect of the HCFA data for higher-than-expected mortality rates. Newspaper attention to the quality of hospital care clearly raised consumer awareness of the idea that health care quality can vary. The newspaper articles, however, provided no guidance on obtaining valid data or on using it to make health care choices.
本文描述了一项针对美国卫生与公众服务部医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)发布的1986年医疗保险患者医院死亡率数据的报纸报道情况的研究。同时也讨论了媒体对联邦政府有关医院医疗质量信息的解读。分析了从美国各地区不同规模城市地区的报纸中抽取的68篇文章样本。文章根据新闻的呈现方式、标题偏向(正面-负面-中性)、对医院的提及、引用来源、对过高死亡率的解释、城市地区人口以及地理区域等进行分类编码。研究结果表明,HCFA发布的1986年医院死亡率数据受到了大量新闻报道。负面标题的数量是正面标题的两倍,尽管近95%的医院死亡率在预期范围内。报纸文章中以医院代表的引述为主,他们常常将高于预期的死亡率归咎于HCFA数据的某些方面。报纸对医院医疗质量的关注显然提高了消费者对医疗质量可能存在差异这一观念的认识。然而,报纸文章并未就如何获取有效数据或如何利用这些数据做出医疗保健选择提供指导。