Mody Gita N, Nirmal Ida Anita, Duraisamy Sulochana, Perakath Benjamin
Department of Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008 Dec;54(12):36-46.
Wound closure using topical negative pressure (TNP) has been reported to be effective, but equipment costs can be prohibitive in resource-challenged countries. Because nonhealing wounds are exceedingly common in developing countries such as India, the ability to optimize wound care with limited resources is very important. To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of providing TNP in an Indian medical referral center, a randomized controlled trial comparing a locally constructed TNP device (treatment) to wet-to-dry gauze dressings (control) was conducted. Eligible study participants (N = 48) were recruited from the inpatient wards. Wound etiologies included diabetic foot ulcers (15), pressure ulcers (11), cellulitis/fasciitis (11), and "other" (11). Following enrollment, wound size was assessed using computer-aided measurements of digital photographs and block-randomized to the study arms using a concealed allocation table. Wounds in both treatment groups were débrided before dressing application and patients were followed until wound closure or being lost to follow-up for an average of 26.3 days (+/- 18.5) in the control and 33.1 days (+/- 37.3) in the treatment group. No statistically significant differences in time to closure between the two treatment groups were observed except in a subset analysis of pressure ulcers (mean 10 +/- 7.11 days for treatment and 27 +/- 10.6 days in control group, P = 0.05). Direct costs to close a pressure ulcer also were lower in the TNP than in the control group. A review of the literature suggests the outcomes obtained using a locally constructed TNP device are similar to those obtained using commercially available devices. As a result of this study, a dedicated tissue viability team has been established to identify wounds suitable for TNP, oversee treatment, monitor the need for surgical débridement, and employ wound healing principles and technology appropriately. These results suggest that inexpensive materials can be utilized for TNP wound closure in a developing country.
据报道,使用局部负压(TNP)进行伤口闭合是有效的,但在资源匮乏的国家,设备成本可能过高。由于在印度等发展中国家,不愈合伤口极为常见,因此利用有限资源优化伤口护理的能力非常重要。为了调查在印度一家医疗转诊中心提供TNP的可行性和疗效,进行了一项随机对照试验,将 locally constructed TNP设备(治疗组)与湿 - 干纱布敷料(对照组)进行比较。符合条件的研究参与者(N = 48)从住院病房招募。伤口病因包括糖尿病足溃疡(15例)、压疮(11例)、蜂窝织炎/筋膜炎(11例)和“其他”(11例)。入组后,使用数字照片的计算机辅助测量评估伤口大小,并使用隐蔽分配表将其区组随机分配到研究组。两个治疗组的伤口在敷料应用前均进行清创,患者接受随访,直至伤口闭合或失访,对照组平均随访26.3天(±18.5),治疗组平均随访33.1天(±37.3)。除了对压疮的亚组分析外,两个治疗组在伤口闭合时间上未观察到统计学上的显著差异(治疗组平均10±7.11天,对照组平均27±10.6天,P = 0.05)。TNP治疗压疮的直接成本也低于对照组。文献综述表明,使用 locally constructed TNP设备获得的结果与使用市售设备获得的结果相似。由于这项研究,已成立了一个专门的组织活力团队,以确定适合TNP治疗的伤口,监督治疗,监测手术清创的需求,并适当应用伤口愈合原则和技术。这些结果表明,在发展中国家,可以使用廉价材料进行TNP伤口闭合。