Armstrong David G, Lavery Lawrence A, Abu-Rumman Patricia, Espensen Eric H, Vazquez Jefferey R, Nixon Brent P, Boulton Andrew J M
Department of Surgery, Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tucson, Ariz., USA.
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 Apr;48(4):64-8.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate outcomes of people with large diabetic foot wounds treated with subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy immediately following surgical wound debridement. Data were abstracted from the medical records of 31 consecutive patients with diabetes, 77.4% male (n = 24), aged 56.1 +/- 11.7 years, presenting for care at two large multidisciplinary wound care centers. All patients received surgical debridement for indolent diabetic foot wounds and were subsequently started on a regimen of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy delivered using a vacuum-assisted closure device for a mean of 4.7 +/- 4.2 weeks (mode = 2 weeks) using a protocol that called for cessation of therapy when the wound bed approached 100% coverage with granulation tissue with no exposed tendon, joint capsule, or bone. Outcomes evaluated included time to complete wound closure, proportion of patients achieving wound healing at the level of initial debridement, and complications associated with use of the device. The mean duration of wounds before therapy was 25.4 +/- 23.8 weeks. In patients treated with subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy, 90.3% (n = 28) of wounds healed at the level of debridement without the need for further bony resection in a mean 8.1 +/- 5.5 weeks. The remaining 9.7% (n = 3) went on to higher level amputation (below knee amputation = 3.2%, [n = 1] and transmetatarsal amputation = 6.5% [n = 2]). Complications included periwound maceration (19.4% [n = 6]), periwound cellulitis (3.2% [n = 1]), and deep space infection (3.2% [n = 1]). The authors concluded that appropriate use of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy to achieve a rapid granular bed in diabetic foot wounds may have promise in treatment of this population at high risk for amputation and that a large, randomized trial is now indicated.
这项回顾性研究的目的是评估在手术清创后立即采用负压伤口治疗法治疗的患有大面积糖尿病足伤口患者的治疗效果。数据取自连续31例糖尿病患者的病历,其中男性占77.4%(n = 24),年龄为56.1±11.7岁,这些患者在两家大型多学科伤口护理中心接受治疗。所有患者均因糖尿病足慢性伤口接受了手术清创,随后开始采用负压伤口治疗法,使用真空辅助闭合装置,平均治疗4.7±4.2周(中位数 = 2周),治疗方案要求当伤口床接近100%被肉芽组织覆盖且无肌腱、关节囊或骨骼暴露时停止治疗。评估的结果包括伤口完全愈合的时间、在初次清创水平实现伤口愈合的患者比例以及与该装置使用相关的并发症。治疗前伤口的平均持续时间为25.4±23.8周。在接受负压伤口治疗法的患者中,90.3%(n = 28)的伤口在清创水平愈合,平均8.1±5.5周内无需进一步的骨切除。其余9.7%(n = 3)的患者进行了更高水平的截肢(膝下截肢 = 3.2%,[n = 1];经跖骨截肢 = 6.5% [n = 2])。并发症包括伤口周围浸渍(19.4% [n = 6])、伤口周围蜂窝织炎(3.2% [n = 1])和深部间隙感染(3.2% [n = 1])。作者得出结论,在糖尿病足伤口中适当使用负压伤口治疗法以实现快速的肉芽床形成,对于治疗这类有高截肢风险的人群可能具有前景,目前需要进行一项大型随机试验。