Suppr超能文献

妊娠糖尿病女性中积极分娩管理与期待性分娩管理的比较:一项系统评价

Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review.

作者信息

Witkop Catherine Takacs, Neale Donna, Wilson Lisa M, Bass Eric B, Nicholson Wanda K

机构信息

From the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Departments of General Preventive Medicine and Population, Family and Reproductive Health; the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medicine; and the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Practice Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;113(1):206-217. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818db36f.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review to estimate benefits and harms of the choice of timing of induction or elective cesarean delivery based on estimated fetal weight or gestational age in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

DATA SOURCES

An electronic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 2007.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Two investigators independently reviewed titles and abstracts, assessed article quality, and abstracted data. Maternal outcomes included cesarean delivery and operative vaginal delivery. Neonatal outcomes included birth weight, macrosomia, large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, neonatal intensive care admissions, and perinatal mortality.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Five studies met our inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four observational studies. The RCT (n=200) compared the effect of labor induction at term with expectant management. The proportion of newborns with birth weight greater than the 90th percentile was significantly greater in the expectant-management group (23% compared with 10% with active induction, P=.02); there were no significant differences in rates of cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, or perinatal deaths. The four observational studies suggest a potential reduction in macrosomia and shoulder dystocia with labor induction and cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight indications, but there was insufficient evidence to assess other clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Active rather than expectant management of labor at term for women with GDM may reduce rates of macrosomia and related complications. Further RCTs and observational studies with a broader range of outcomes are needed for sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估基于估计胎儿体重或孕周选择引产或择期剖宫产时机对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)女性的益处和危害。

数据来源

使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引以及Cochrane对照试验中心注册库进行电子文献检索,检索时间从建库至2007年1月。

研究选择方法

两名研究者独立审查标题和摘要,评估文章质量并提取数据。母体结局包括剖宫产和阴道助产。新生儿结局包括出生体重、巨大儿、大于胎龄儿、肩难产、产伤、新生儿重症监护病房收治率和围产期死亡率。

列表、整合与结果:五项研究符合我们的纳入标准:一项随机对照试验(RCT)和四项观察性研究。该RCT(n = 200)比较了足月引产与期待治疗的效果。期待治疗组出生体重高于第90百分位数的新生儿比例显著更高(23%,而积极引产组为10%,P = 0.02);剖宫产率、肩难产率、新生儿低血糖率或围产期死亡率无显著差异。四项观察性研究表明,对于估计胎儿体重指征进行引产和剖宫产可能会降低巨大儿和肩难产的发生率,但评估其他临床结局的证据不足。

结论

对于GDM女性,足月时积极引产而非期待治疗可能会降低巨大儿及相关并发症的发生率。需要进一步开展范围更广的结局的RCT和观察性研究,以获得足够的证据为临床实践提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验