Brabant Sarah, Kalich Deann
University of Louisiana at Lafayette, USA.
Omega (Westport). 2008;58(1):1-18. doi: 10.2190/om.58.1.a.
A major concern for the pioneers in death education at the college level was the need to recognize those students who enrolled in the course in order to get help with death related issues, primarily suicidal thoughts and unresolved grief. Despite anecdotal evidence of these at-risk students, this concern has yet to be addressed adequately. This may be due in part to the paucity of empirical evidence. The authors bring over 30 combined years of experience in teaching death education at the university level. They have their own anecdotal stories. They also have empirical evidence. This article addresses the question of why students take death education courses in college by examining data collected from death education classes over a span of 20 years and 3 decades (1985-2004). The results document the magnitude and consistency of the at-risk student. The authors discuss the precautionary steps they take and call for a renewed discourse on ethical considerations in death education.
大学层面死亡教育的先驱者们主要关注的一个问题是,需要识别那些为了获得与死亡相关问题的帮助(主要是自杀念头和未解决的悲伤情绪)而选修该课程的学生。尽管有关于这些高危学生的传闻证据,但这一问题仍未得到充分解决。部分原因可能是实证证据不足。作者们在大学层面教授死亡教育的经验加起来超过30年。他们有自己的传闻故事。他们也有实证证据。本文通过研究在20年和3个十年(1985 - 2004年)期间从死亡教育课程收集的数据,探讨了大学生选修死亡教育课程的原因。结果记录了高危学生的规模和一致性。作者们讨论了他们采取的预防措施,并呼吁重新讨论死亡教育中的伦理考量。