Gauthier Yves P, Tournier Jean-Nicolas, Paucod Jean-Charles, Corre Jean-Philippe, Mock Michèle, Goossens Pierre L, Vidal Dominique R
Département de Biologie des Agents Transmissibles, Centre de Recherches du Service de Santé des Armées Emile Pardé, 38702 La Tronche, France.
Infect Immun. 2009 Mar;77(3):1197-207. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01217-08. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
Protective antigen (PA)-based anthrax vaccines acting on toxins are less effective than live attenuated vaccines, suggesting that additional antigens may contribute to protective immunity. Several reports indicate that capsule or spore-associated antigens may enhance the protection afforded by PA. Addition of formaldehyde-inactivated spores (FIS) to PA (PA-FIS) elicits total protection against cutaneous anthrax. Nevertheless, vaccines that are effective against cutaneous anthrax may not be so against inhalational anthrax. The aim of this work was to optimize immunization with PA-FIS and to assess vaccine efficacy against inhalational anthrax. We assessed the immune response to recombinant anthrax PA from Bacillus anthracis (rPA)-FIS administered by various immunization protocols and the protection provided to mice and guinea pigs infected through the respiratory route with spores of a virulent strain of B. anthracis. Combined subcutaneous plus intranasal immunization of mice yielded a mucosal immunoglobulin G response to rPA that was more than 20 times higher than that in lung mucosal secretions after subcutaneous vaccination. The titers of toxin-neutralizing antibody and antispore antibody were also significantly higher: nine and eight times higher, respectively. The optimized immunization elicited total protection of mice intranasally infected with the virulent B. anthracis strain 17JB. Guinea pigs were fully protected, both against an intranasal challenge with 100 50% lethal doses (LD(50)) and against an aerosol with 75 LD(50) of spores of the highly virulent strain 9602. Conversely, immunization with PA alone did not elicit protection. These results demonstrate that the association of PA and spores is very much more effective than PA alone against experimental inhalational anthrax.
作用于毒素的基于保护性抗原(PA)的炭疽疫苗不如减毒活疫苗有效,这表明其他抗原可能有助于提供保护性免疫。几份报告表明,荚膜或孢子相关抗原可能增强PA所提供的保护作用。在PA中添加甲醛灭活孢子(FIS)(PA-FIS)可引发对皮肤炭疽的完全保护。然而,对皮肤炭疽有效的疫苗对吸入性炭疽可能并非如此。这项工作的目的是优化PA-FIS免疫接种,并评估疫苗对吸入性炭疽的疗效。我们评估了通过各种免疫方案接种来自炭疽芽孢杆菌的重组炭疽PA(rPA)-FIS后的免疫反应,以及对经呼吸道感染强毒株炭疽芽孢杆菌孢子的小鼠和豚鼠提供的保护作用。小鼠皮下加鼻内联合免疫产生的对rPA的黏膜免疫球蛋白G反应比皮下接种后肺黏膜分泌物中的反应高20倍以上。毒素中和抗体和抗孢子抗体的滴度也显著更高,分别高出9倍和8倍。优化后的免疫接种使鼻内感染强毒株炭疽芽孢杆菌17JB的小鼠获得了完全保护。豚鼠得到了充分保护,既抵抗了100个50%致死剂量(LD50)的鼻内攻击,也抵抗了75个LD50的高毒力菌株9602孢子的气溶胶攻击。相反,单独用PA免疫未引发保护作用。这些结果表明,PA与孢子联合使用对实验性吸入性炭疽的效果比单独使用PA要有效得多。