Suppr超能文献

再探缪勒-莱尔错觉:视觉中用于行动和感知的不同注视模式。

Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.

作者信息

van Doorn Hemke, van der Kamp John, de Wit Matthieu, Savelsbergh Geert J P

机构信息

Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):804-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

Abstract

Following Goodale and Milner's [Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20-25] proposal to distinguish the dorsal and ventral systems on basis of the functional demands they serve (i.e., action and perception), a vast literature has emerged that scrutinized if the dorsal and ventral systems indeed process information into egocentric and allocentric codes in accordance with their respective functions. However, a corollary of Goodale and Milner's original proposal, that these functional demands also impose different constraints on information detection, has been largely overlooked. In the present study, we measured gaze patterns to investigate how information detection for action and perception differs. In two conditions, participants (N=9) grasped or made a manual estimate of the length of a shaft embedded in a Müller-Lyer configuration. The illusion significantly affected the manual estimates, but not the hand aperture during grasping. In line with these behavioral findings, significant differences in gaze patterns were revealed between the two tasks. Participants spent more time looking at areas that contain egocentric information (i.e., centre of the shaft) when grasping as compared to making a manual length estimate. In addition, participants, made more gaze shifts (i.e., especially between the two areas surrounding the shaft endpoints and including the arrowheads) when making the manual length estimate, enabling the pick up of allocentric information. This difference was more pronounced during task execution as compared to task preparation (i.e., before movement onset). These results support the contention that the functional distinction between the dorsal and ventral systems is not limited to the processing of information, but also encompasses the detection of information.

摘要

继古德尔和米尔纳[古德尔,M. A.,&米尔纳,A. D.(1992年)。用于感知和行动的分离视觉通路。神经科学趋势,15(1),20 - 25]基于它们所服务的功能需求(即行动和感知)来区分背侧和腹侧系统的提议之后,出现了大量文献,审视背侧和腹侧系统是否确实根据各自功能将信息处理为以自我为中心和以他者为中心的代码。然而,古德尔和米尔纳最初提议的一个推论,即这些功能需求也对信息检测施加了不同的限制,在很大程度上被忽视了。在本研究中,我们测量了注视模式,以研究行动和感知的信息检测有何不同。在两种条件下,参与者(N = 9)抓取或手动估计嵌入缪勒 - 莱尔图形中的杆的长度。错觉显著影响了手动估计,但不影响抓取时的手部孔径。与这些行为结果一致,两项任务之间的注视模式存在显著差异。与进行手动长度估计相比,参与者在抓取时花更多时间注视包含以自我为中心信息的区域(即杆的中心)。此外,参与者在进行手动长度估计时进行了更多的注视转移(即特别是在杆端点周围的两个区域之间,包括箭头),从而能够获取以他者为中心的信息。与任务准备阶段(即运动开始前)相比,这种差异在任务执行期间更为明显。这些结果支持了这样的论点,即背侧和腹侧系统之间的功能区别不仅限于信息处理,还包括信息检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验