Franz Volker H, Gegenfurtner Karl R
University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Oct-Dec;25(7-8):920-50.
The finding that the Ebbinghaus/Titchener illusion deceives perception but not grasping is usually seen as strong evidence for Goodale and Milner's (1992) notion of two parallel visual systems, one being conscious and deceived by the illusion (vision-for-perception) and the other being unconscious and not deceived (vision-for-action). However, this finding is controversial and led to studies with seemingly contradictory results. We argue that these results are not as contradictory as it might seem. Instead, studies consistently show similar effects of the illusion on grasping. The perceptual effects are strongly dependent on the specific perceptual measure employed. If, however, some methodological precautions are used, then these diverse perceptual results can be reconciled and point to a single internal size estimate that is used for perception and for grasping. This suggests that the Ebbinghaus illusion deceives a common representation of object size that is used by perception and action.
埃宾浩斯/铁钦纳错觉会欺骗感知但不会欺骗抓握这一发现,通常被视为对古德尔和米尔纳(1992)提出的两个平行视觉系统概念的有力证据,其中一个是有意识的且会被错觉欺骗(用于感知的视觉),另一个是无意识的且不会被欺骗(用于行动的视觉)。然而,这一发现存在争议,并导致了一些结果看似相互矛盾的研究。我们认为这些结果并不像看起来那样矛盾。相反,研究一致表明错觉对抓握有类似的影响。感知效应强烈依赖于所采用的具体感知测量方法。然而,如果采取一些方法上的预防措施,那么这些不同的感知结果就可以得到调和,并指向一个用于感知和抓握的单一内部大小估计。这表明埃宾浩斯错觉欺骗了一个用于感知和行动的物体大小的共同表征。