Rusu M C, Pop F, Curcă G C, Podoleanu L, Voinea L M
Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 8, Bd. Eroilor Sanitari, RO-76241 Bucharest, Romania.
Ann Anat. 2009 Apr;191(2):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
As a rule the pterygopalatine ganglion (PPG) is considered to be a single structure of the parasympathetic nervous system, associated with the maxillary nerve in the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF). A few structural studies in humans are available in the indexed references. We designed the present study of the PPG in order to provide evidence of possible variations in morphological patterns of the PPG. We performed dissections of the PPF on 20 human adult heads, using different approaches. The dissected specimens were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and silver (Bielschowsky) or prepared for immunohistochemistry for synaptophisin and neurofilament. Four morphological types of the PPG were defined macroscopically: A (10%): partitioned PPG, the upper partition receiving the vidian nerve; B (55%): single, the upper part (base) receiving the vidian nerve; C (15%): single, but the vidian nerve reaches the lower part (tip) of the ganglion; D (20%): partitioned, the lower partition receiving the vidian nerve. We propose that it may be inappropriate to invariably regard the PPG as a single morphological structure. From individual to individual the PPG may present either as a single ganglion or as a partitioned one, with distinct superior and inferior components. Nevertheless, the presence of the dispersed pterygopalatine microganglia (DPPG) evidenced by histochemistry and immunohistochemistry serves to complete an individually variable morphological pattern of a structure usually described as single. The individual variation may be the reason for failures in ablation procedures of the PPG; partitions of the PPG and/or the DPPG may functionally correlate with specific territories and targets and further tracing studies may be helpful in validating or invalidating this theory.
通常认为翼腭神经节(PPG)是副交感神经系统的单一结构,与翼腭窝(PPF)内的上颌神经相关。在索引参考文献中有一些关于人类的结构研究。我们设计了本项关于PPG的研究,以提供PPG形态模式可能存在变异的证据。我们采用不同方法对20个成年人类头部的PPF进行了解剖。解剖后的标本用苏木精-伊红和银( Bielschowsky)染色,或制备用于突触素和神经丝的免疫组织化学检测。宏观上定义了PPG的四种形态类型:A(10%):分隔型PPG,上部分隔接受翼管神经;B(55%):单一型,上部(基部)接受翼管神经;C(15%):单一型,但翼管神经到达神经节的下部(尖端);D(20%):分隔型,下部分隔接受翼管神经。我们认为将PPG始终视为单一形态结构可能并不合适。个体之间的PPG可能表现为单个神经节或分隔型神经节,具有明显的上部和下部成分。然而,组织化学和免疫组织化学证明的散在翼腭微神经节(DPPG)的存在,完善了通常被描述为单一结构的个体可变形态模式。个体差异可能是PPG消融手术失败的原因;PPG的分隔和/或DPPG可能在功能上与特定区域和靶点相关,进一步的追踪研究可能有助于验证或否定这一理论。