Fu Qinwei, Zhang Lanzhi, Liu Yang, Li Xinrong, Yang Yepeng, Dai Menglin, Zhang Qinxiu
School of Acupuncture and Moxibustion and Tuina/Third Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China.
Teaching Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Mar 12;2019:6478102. doi: 10.1155/2019/6478102. eCollection 2019.
To evaluate the efficiency of acupuncturing at the sphenopalatine ganglion acupoint alone for treatment of allergic rhinitis.
A total of ten online databases were searched to find studies published up to Jan. 2018. Primary outcome measures include the TNSS, the RQLQ score, the VAS score, total effective rate, score for signs and symptoms, and the improvement of disease classification. Study quality of each included article was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was conducted based on the Cochrane systematic review method by using RevMan 5.3 software.
Acupuncturing SGA alone was the only therapy in experimental group. Interventions in control groups includes sham acupuncture, acupuncturing other regular acupoints, and western medicine. Specific techniques included manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture only.
They include TNSS, RQLQ, VAS score, total effective rate, the improvement of disease classification.
Ten studies of eight articles involving 1004 participants were included. Result of meta-analysis showed that acupuncturing sphenopalatine ganglion acupoints alone was more effective than control groups. However, several adverse effects were reported.
These findings show that acupuncturing the sphenopalatine ganglion acupoint alone has a potential role in alleviating nasal symptoms, improving quality of life for patients, and the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, suggesting it as a considerable therapy for allergic rhinitis. However, more studies are needed to execute a subgroup analysis of various variables and to evaluate the publication bias of the study.
评估单独针刺蝶腭神经节穴位治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效。
检索了总共10个在线数据库,以查找截至2018年1月发表的研究。主要结局指标包括鼻结膜炎症状和体征总评分(TNSS)、鼻炎生活质量问卷(RQLQ)评分、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、总有效率、症状和体征评分以及疾病分类改善情况。采用Cochrane协作网偏倚风险工具对每篇纳入文章的研究质量进行评估。使用RevMan 5.3软件,基于Cochrane系统评价方法进行荟萃分析。
试验组仅采用单独针刺蝶腭神经节这一疗法。对照组的干预措施包括假针刺、针刺其他常规穴位以及西药治疗。具体技术仅包括手针和电针。
包括TNSS、RQLQ、VAS评分、总有效率、疾病分类改善情况。
纳入了涉及1004名参与者的8篇文章中的10项研究。荟萃分析结果显示,单独针刺蝶腭神经节穴位比对照组更有效。然而,报告了一些不良反应。
这些研究结果表明,单独针刺蝶腭神经节穴位在减轻鼻部症状、改善患者生活质量以及针刺治疗变应性鼻炎的有效性方面具有潜在作用,提示其可作为变应性鼻炎的一种重要治疗方法。然而,需要更多研究对各种变量进行亚组分析,并评估研究的发表偏倚。