Suppr超能文献

应对乳腺癌易感性基因检测

Coping with genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

作者信息

Dougall Angela Liegey, Smith Ashley W, Somers Tamara J, Posluszny Donna M, Rubinstein Wendy S, Baum Andrew

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2009 Jan;71(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318190d7b4. Epub 2009 Jan 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine how women cope with genetic testing for heightened susceptibility to breast cancer.

METHODS

Participants were 126 White women (age = 44 +/- 9 years) who were participants in a larger study of genetic testing for risk of different chronic diseases. All women were at higher-than-average risk for breast cancer due to a personal and/or family history and were considering genetic testing. Distress (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, Impact of Event Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) was assessed at four assessments; one before and three after the decision to have genetic testing. The majority of women (n = 100) had testing. The follow-up assessments occurred at 1 week after receiving results (or 3-4 months after baseline if testing was not elected), and then at 3 and 6 months after the second assessment. Coping (Brief COPE) was measured at the first and third assessments.

RESULTS

Coping was relatively stable over time and did not vary as a function of genetic test results. Active coping strategies were used more often by women with a personal cancer history than by women without cancer. Use of avoidant coping was reliably and positively associated with distress over time independent of cancer history and test result.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of specific coping styles that were associated with more or less distress is useful as a means of identifying and targeting coping interventions and predicting which participants may be at risk for distress.

摘要

目的

研究女性如何应对乳腺癌易感性增强的基因检测。

方法

参与者为126名白人女性(年龄 = 44 ± 9岁),她们参与了一项关于不同慢性病风险基因检测的更大规模研究。由于个人和/或家族病史,所有女性患乳腺癌的风险均高于平均水平,且正在考虑进行基因检测。在四个评估阶段对痛苦程度(症状自评量表-90修订版、事件影响量表、感知压力量表、斯皮尔伯格状态-特质焦虑量表以及流行病学研究中心抑郁量表)进行评估;一个阶段在决定进行基因检测之前,另外三个阶段在决定之后。大多数女性(n = 100)进行了检测。随访评估在收到结果后1周进行(如果未选择检测,则在基线后3 - 4个月进行),然后在第二次评估后的3个月和6个月进行。应对方式(简易应对方式问卷)在第一次和第三次评估时进行测量。

结果

随着时间推移,应对方式相对稳定,且不会因基因检测结果而有所不同。有个人癌症病史的女性比没有癌症的女性更常使用积极应对策略。随着时间推移,无论癌症病史和检测结果如何,使用回避应对方式与痛苦程度之间存在可靠的正相关。

结论

识别与或多或少痛苦相关的特定应对方式,对于识别和针对应对干预措施以及预测哪些参与者可能处于痛苦风险中是有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验