Arora Taruna, Padaki Rupa, Liu Ling, Hamburger Agnes E, Ellison Aaron R, Stevens Seth R, Louie James S, Kohno Tadahiko
Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA.
Cytokine. 2009 Feb;45(2):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
There are currently two Food and Drug Administration-approved classes of biologic agents that target tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha): anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (adalimumab and infliximab), and soluble TNF receptors (etanercept). This study examined the ability of the TNF antagonists to: (1) bind various polymorphic variants of cell surface-expressed Fc receptors (FcgammaRs) and the complement component C1q, and (2) mediate Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CDC) killing of cells expressing membrane-bound TNF (mTNF) in vitro. Both mAbs and the soluble TNF receptor demonstrated low-level binding to the activating receptors FcgammaRI, FcgammaRIIa, and FcgammaRIIIa, and the inhibitory receptor FcgammaRIIb, in the absence of exogenous TNF. However, upon addition of TNF, the mAbs, but not etanercept, showed significantly increased binding, in particular to the FcgammaRII and FcgammaRIII receptors. Infliximab and adalimumab induced ADCC much more potently than etanercept. In the presence of TNF, both mAbs bound C1q in in vitro assays, but etanercept did not bind C1q under any conditions. Infliximab and adalimumab also induced CDC in cells expressing mTNF more potently than etanercept. Differences in the ability to bind ligand and mediate cell death may account for the differences in efficacy and safety of TNF antagonists.
目前,美国食品药品监督管理局批准了两类靶向肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的生物制剂:抗TNF单克隆抗体(mAb)(阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗)以及可溶性TNF受体(依那西普)。本研究检测了TNF拮抗剂的以下能力:(1)结合细胞表面表达的Fc受体(FcγRs)的各种多态性变体和补体成分C1q,以及(2)在体外介导抗体依赖性细胞毒性(ADCC)和补体介导的细胞毒性(CDC)对表达膜结合TNF(mTNF)的细胞的杀伤作用。在没有外源性TNF的情况下,mAb和可溶性TNF受体均显示出与激活受体FcγRI、FcγRIIa和FcγRIIIa以及抑制性受体FcγRIIb的低水平结合。然而,加入TNF后,mAb而非依那西普显示出结合显著增加,特别是与FcγRII和FcγRIII受体的结合。英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗诱导ADCC的能力比依那西普强得多。在TNF存在的情况下,两种mAb在体外试验中均能结合C1q,但依那西普在任何条件下均不结合C1q。英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗诱导表达mTNF的细胞发生CDC的能力也比依那西普强。结合配体和介导细胞死亡能力的差异可能解释了TNF拮抗剂在疗效和安全性上的差异。