Rutledge Thomas, Vaccarino Viola, Johnson B Delia, Bittner Vera, Olson Marian B, Linke Sarah E, Cornell Carol E, Eteiba Wafia, Sheps David S, Francis Jennifer, Krantz David S, Bairey Merz C Noel, Parashar Susmita, Handberg Eileen, Vido Diane A, Shaw Leslee J
Psychology Service 116B, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jan 13;53(2):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.032.
This study evaluated 3 novel questions in a prospective clinical cohort of women undergoing evaluation for suspected myocardial ischemia: 1) What is the relationship between depression and cardiovascular costs? 2) Does the relationship vary by definition of depression? 3) Do depression-cost relationship patterns differ among women with versus without coronary artery disease (CAD)?
Comorbid depression has been linked to higher medical costs in previous studies of cardiovascular patients.
A total of 868 women presenting with suspected myocardial ischemia completed an extensive baseline examination including cardiovascular risk factor assessment and coronary angiogram. Depression was defined by: 1) current use of antidepressants; 2) a reported history of depression treatment; and 3) Beck Depression Inventory scores. Direct (hospitalizations, office visits, procedures, and medications) and indirect (out-of-pocket, lost productivity, and travel) costs were collected through 5 years of follow-up to estimate cardiovascular costs.
Using the study criteria, 17% to 45% of the women studied met study depression criteria. Depressed women showed adjusted annual cardiovascular costs $1,550 to $3,300 higher than nondepressed groups (r = 0.08 to 0.12, p < 0.05). Depression-cost relationships also varied by CAD status, with stronger associations present among women without evidence of significant CAD.
Depression was associated with 15% to 53% increases in 5-year cardiovascular costs, and cost differences were present using 3 definitions of depression. The results reinforce the importance of assessing depression in clinical populations and support the hypothesis that improved management of depression in women with suspected myocardial ischemia could reduce medical costs.
本研究在一个对疑似心肌缺血进行评估的前瞻性临床队列中,对3个新问题进行了评估:1)抑郁症与心血管疾病成本之间的关系是什么?2)这种关系是否因抑郁症的定义不同而有所变化?3)患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)与未患冠状动脉疾病的女性之间,抑郁症-成本关系模式是否存在差异?
在先前针对心血管疾病患者的研究中,共病抑郁症与更高的医疗成本相关。
共有868名疑似心肌缺血的女性完成了一项全面的基线检查,包括心血管危险因素评估和冠状动脉造影。抑郁症的定义为:1)目前正在使用抗抑郁药;2)报告有抑郁症治疗史;3)贝克抑郁量表评分。通过5年的随访收集直接成本(住院、门诊就诊、手术和药物治疗)和间接成本(自付费用、生产力损失和差旅费),以估算心血管疾病成本。
根据研究标准,17%至45%的研究对象符合研究抑郁症标准。抑郁症患者经调整后的年度心血管疾病成本比非抑郁症组高1550至3300美元(r = 0.08至0.12,p < 0.05)。抑郁症与成本的关系也因CAD状态而异,在没有明显CAD证据的女性中,两者的关联更强。
抑郁症与5年心血管疾病成本增加15%至53%相关,并且使用3种抑郁症定义均存在成本差异。这些结果强化了在临床人群中评估抑郁症的重要性,并支持以下假设:改善对疑似心肌缺血女性抑郁症的管理可以降低医疗成本。