Suppr超能文献

肥胖症患者的腔内手术:肥胖症外科医生的期望

Endoluminal procedures for bariatric patients: expectations among bariatric surgeons.

作者信息

Brethauer Stacy A, Pryor Aurora D, Chand Bipan, Schauer Philip, Rosenthal Raul, Richards William, Bessler Marc

机构信息

Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Mar-Apr;5(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.09.019. Epub 2008 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary and revisional bariatric endoluminal procedures are currently being developed. Acceptable levels of risk and weight loss for these procedures have not yet been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expectations and concerns among bariatric surgeons regarding these procedures.

METHODS

The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Emerging Technologies Committee developed a questionnaire that was distributed to the membership. Risk tolerance was assessed with comparison to commonly performed endoscopic and bariatric procedures. The percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) ranges were provided to assess the expectations for results 1 year after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 214 responses were returned. The acceptable level of risk to achieve 10-20% EWL after primary and revisional procedures was equivalent to, or less than, that of a therapeutic endoscopic procedure for 81% and 76% of respondents, respectively. The acceptable level of risk to achieve 30-40% EWL after primary and revisional procedures was equivalent to that after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for 45% and 35% of respondents, respectively and equivalent to that after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for 8% and 22%, respectively. In addition, 62% of respondents responded that 10-30% EWL would be acceptable for revisional procedures, and 35% responded that 10-30% EWL would be acceptable after a primary procedure. The primary concern was unproven efficacy, followed by durability, poor weight loss, availability of equipment, and procedural risk. Finally, 58% would not be willing to recommend an endoluminal procedure until the efficacy has been established, regardless of the risk.

CONCLUSION

Risk tolerance and weight loss expectations among bariatric surgeons are different for primary and revisional endoscopic procedures. Most surgeons were unwilling to consider endoluminal procedures for their patients until the efficacy has been proven.

摘要

背景

原发性和修订性减重腔内手术目前正在研发中。这些手术可接受的风险水平和减重效果尚未确定。本研究的目的是评估减重外科医生对这些手术的期望和担忧。

方法

美国代谢与减重外科学会新兴技术委员会编制了一份问卷并分发给会员。通过与常见的内镜和减重手术进行比较来评估风险承受能力。提供了超重减重百分比(EWL)范围,以评估手术后1年对结果的期望。

结果

共收到214份回复。对于原发性和修订性手术后达到10 - 20% EWL的可接受风险水平,分别有81%和76%的受访者认为等同于或低于治疗性内镜手术的风险水平。对于原发性和修订性手术后达到30 - 40% EWL的可接受风险水平,分别有45%和35%的受访者认为等同于腹腔镜可调节胃束带术后的风险水平,分别有8%和22%的受访者认为等同于腹腔镜Roux - en - Y胃旁路术后的风险水平。此外,62%的受访者表示修订性手术中10 - 30%的EWL是可接受的,35%的受访者表示原发性手术后10 - 30%的EWL是可接受的。主要担忧是疗效未经证实,其次是持久性、减重效果不佳、设备可用性和手术风险。最后,58%的人表示在疗效得到证实之前,无论风险如何,都不愿意为患者推荐腔内手术。

结论

减重外科医生对原发性和修订性内镜手术的风险承受能力和减重期望不同。大多数外科医生在疗效得到证实之前不愿意为患者考虑腔内手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验