• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济、监管和专利政策对癌症化学预防创新的影响。

Impact of economic, regulatory, and patent policies on innovation in cancer chemoprevention.

作者信息

Grabowski Henry G, Moe Jeffrey L

机构信息

Department of Economics, Duke University, Box 90097, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008 Jul;1(2):84-90. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0048. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0048
PMID:19138940
Abstract

Chemoprevention agents are an emerging new scientific area that holds out the promise of delaying or avoiding a number of common cancers. These new agents face significant scientific, regulatory, and economic barriers, however, which have limited investment in their research and development (R&D). These barriers include above-average clinical trial scales, lengthy time frames between discovery and Food and Drug Administration approval, liability risks (because they are given to healthy individuals), and a growing funding gap for early-stage candidates. The longer time frames and risks associated with chemoprevention also cause exclusivity time on core patents to be limited or subject to significant uncertainties. We conclude that chemoprevention uniquely challenges the structure of incentives embodied in the economic, regulatory, and patent policies for the biopharmaceutical industry. Many of these policy issues are illustrated by the recently Food and Drug Administration-approved preventive agents Gardasil and raloxifene. Our recommendations to increase R&D investment in chemoprevention agents include (a) increased data exclusivity times on new biological and chemical drugs to compensate for longer gestation periods and increasing R&D costs; chemoprevention is at the far end of the distribution in this regard; (b) policies such as early-stage research grants and clinical development tax credits targeted specifically to chemoprevention agents (these are policies that have been very successful in increasing R&D investment for orphan drugs); and (c) a no-fault liability insurance program like that currently in place for children's vaccines.

摘要

化学预防剂是一个新兴的科学领域,有望延缓或避免多种常见癌症。然而,这些新型药剂面临着重大的科学、监管和经济障碍,这限制了对其研发(R&D)的投资。这些障碍包括高于平均水平的临床试验规模、从发现到获得食品药品监督管理局批准之间的漫长时间框架、责任风险(因为它们是给予健康个体的),以及早期候选药物不断扩大的资金缺口。与化学预防相关的更长时间框架和风险也导致核心专利的排他期受到限制或存在重大不确定性。我们得出结论,化学预防对生物制药行业经济、监管和专利政策中所体现的激励结构构成了独特挑战。最近食品药品监督管理局批准的预防剂加德西(Gardasil)和雷洛昔芬就说明了其中许多政策问题。我们关于增加化学预防剂研发投资的建议包括:(a)延长新生物和化学药物的数据排他期,以补偿更长的孕育期和不断增加的研发成本;在这方面,化学预防处于分布的最末端;(b)制定专门针对化学预防剂的政策,如早期研究资助和临床开发税收抵免(这些政策在增加孤儿药研发投资方面非常成功);(c)建立一个类似于目前儿童疫苗所采用的无过错责任保险计划。

相似文献

1
Impact of economic, regulatory, and patent policies on innovation in cancer chemoprevention.经济、监管和专利政策对癌症化学预防创新的影响。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2008 Jul;1(2):84-90. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0048. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
2
Cancer chemoprevention and cancer preventive vaccines--a call to action: leaders of diverse stakeholder groups present strategies for overcoming multiple barriers to meet an urgent need.癌症化学预防与癌症预防性疫苗——行动呼吁:不同利益相关者群体的领导者提出克服多重障碍以满足迫切需求的策略。
Cancer Res. 2006 Dec 15;66(24):11540-9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4122. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
3
The roles of patents and research and development incentives in biopharmaceutical innovation.专利与研发激励措施在生物制药创新中的作用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):302-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1047.
4
Can open-source drug R&D repower pharmaceutical innovation?开源药物研发能否重振药物创新?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;87(5):534-6. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.26.
5
Using market-exclusivity incentives to promote pharmaceutical innovation.利用市场独占激励措施促进药物创新。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 4;363(19):1855-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle1002961.
6
Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D.孤儿药开发:生物制药研发的经济可行策略。
Drug Discov Today. 2012 Jul;17(13-14):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
7
Intellectual property. Balancing innovation and access: patent challenges tip the scales.知识产权。平衡创新与获取:专利挑战使天平倾斜。
Science. 2009 Oct 16;326(5951):370-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1176116.
8
Should the patent system for new medicines be abolished?治疗新型药物的专利制度应该被废除吗?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;82(5):488-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100393.
9
Economics of new oncology drug development.新型肿瘤药物研发的经济学
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):209-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0803.
10
Incentives for drug development--the curious case of colchicine.药物研发的激励因素——秋水仙碱的奇特案例
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2045-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1003126. Epub 2010 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Patent cliff and strategic switch: exploring strategic design possibilities in the pharmaceutical industry.专利悬崖与战略转变:探索制药行业的战略设计可能性
Springerplus. 2016 May 23;5(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2323-1. eCollection 2016.
2
Phase 0 clinical chemoprevention trial of the Akt inhibitor SR13668.Akt 抑制剂 SR13668 的 0 期临床化学预防试验。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Mar;4(3):347-53. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0313.
3
Regulatory approval of cancer risk-reducing (chemopreventive) drugs: moving what we have learned into the clinic.
癌症风险降低(化学预防)药物的监管批准:将我们所学到的知识应用于临床。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Mar;4(3):311-23. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0014.