Fisher James P, Ogoh Shigehiko, Junor Chelif, Khaja Azamuddin, Northrup Mindy, Fadel Paul J
Department of Medical Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Missouri, Colombia, MO 65212, USA.
Exp Physiol. 2009 Apr;94(4):447-58. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.044867. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
The dynamic relationship between 'spontaneous' fluctuations in arterial blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) is increasingly being used to provide an estimate of resting cardiac baroreflex sensitivity. Given the ease of use and clinical utility, spontaneous methods are now also being used to examine cardiac baroreflex sensitivity in distinct subject groups during various laboratory stressors and tasks encountered during daily life, such as physical activity. However, the utility of such spontaneous measures to estimate cardiac baroreflex function during exercise remains unclear, particularly when comparing groups. Therefore, we tested the ability of spontaneous indices to detect age-related differences in cardiac baroreflex function during dynamic exercise. Beat-to-beat HR and BP were measured in eighteen healthy young subjects (24 +/- 1 years) and sixteen healthy middle-aged subjects (59 +/- 1 years) at rest and during steady-state leg cycling. Estimates of spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity using the sequence technique (G(SEQ)) and low-frequency transfer function gain (G(TF)) were compared with the operating point (G(OP)) and maximal gain (G(MAX)) of the full carotid-cardiac baroreflex function curve. At rest G(SEQ), G(TF), G(OP) and G(MAX) were all significantly lower in older subjects. During moderate-intensity steady-state exercise no differences were observed in G(SEQ) and G(TF) (older 0.26 +/- 0.03 beats min(-1) mmHg(-1) versus younger 0.32 +/- 0.04 beats min(-1) mmHg(-1); P > 0.05), whereas G(OP) and G(MAX) (older -0.21 +/- 0.02 beats min(-1) mmHg(-1) versus younger -0.39 +/- 0.03 beats min(-1) mmHg(-1); P < 0.05) remained lower in older subjects. These data indicate that spontaneous measures of cardiac baroreflex sensitivity alone provide limited information when comparing age-groups during exercise, which makes genuine differences in baroreflex function difficult to identify.
动脉血压(BP)和心率(HR)的“自发”波动之间的动态关系越来越多地被用于估计静息状态下的心脏压力反射敏感性。鉴于其易用性和临床实用性,自发测量方法现在也被用于检测不同受试者群体在各种实验室应激源以及日常生活中遇到的任务(如体育活动)期间的心脏压力反射敏感性。然而,这种自发测量方法在运动期间估计心脏压力反射功能的效用仍不明确,尤其是在比较不同群体时。因此,我们测试了自发指标在动态运动期间检测心脏压力反射功能与年龄相关差异的能力。在静息状态和稳态腿部骑行过程中,对18名健康年轻受试者(24±1岁)和16名健康中年受试者(59±1岁)进行逐搏心率和血压测量。将使用序列技术(G(SEQ))和低频传递函数增益(G(TF))对自发心脏压力反射敏感性的估计值与完整颈动脉-心脏压力反射功能曲线的工作点(G(OP))和最大增益(G(MAX))进行比较。静息时,老年受试者的G(SEQ)、G(TF)、G(OP)和G(MAX)均显著较低。在中等强度稳态运动期间,G(SEQ)和G(TF)未观察到差异(老年组0.26±0.03次/分钟/毫米汞柱,年轻组0.32±0.04次/分钟/毫米汞柱;P>0.05),而老年受试者的G(OP)和G(MAX)(老年组-0.21±0.02次/分钟/毫米汞柱,年轻组-0.39±0.03次/分钟/毫米汞柱;P<0.05)仍然较低。这些数据表明,在运动期间比较不同年龄组时,仅靠自发测量心脏压力反射敏感性所提供的信息有限,这使得难以识别压力反射功能的真正差异。