Boelen Paul A, Hoijtink Herbert
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Death Stud. 2009 Feb;33(2):101-29. doi: 10.1080/07481180802602758.
Item response theory modeling was applied to the data of 1,321 bereaved individuals who completed the Dutch version of the Inventory of Complicated Grief--Revised (ICG-R)--a 29-item self-report measure of complicated grief (CG). The authors aimed to examine the information that each of the ICG-R items contributes to the measurement of overall CG severity and to detect possible differences between subgroups of mourners in the way CG items are endorsed. Findings showed that items differed in their ability to distinguish individual differences in CG severity. Items that discriminated best between low and high CG were "feeling numb," "feeling that the future holds no meaning or purpose," and "unable imagining life being fulfilling without the lost person." Items were reasonably well dispersed across the range of CG severity. There was little evidence of differential item functioning between gender groups and victims of violent vs. non-violent loss.
项目反应理论模型被应用于1321名丧亲者的数据,这些丧亲者完成了荷兰版的复杂悲伤量表修订版(ICG-R)——这是一个包含29个条目的复杂悲伤(CG)自评量表。作者旨在检验ICG-R的每个条目对总体CG严重程度测量的贡献信息,并检测哀悼者亚组在认可CG条目的方式上可能存在的差异。研究结果表明,各条目在区分CG严重程度个体差异的能力上有所不同。在低CG和高CG之间区分效果最佳的条目是“感觉麻木”、“感觉未来没有意义或目标”以及“无法想象没有逝者的生活是充实的”。条目在CG严重程度范围内分布较为合理。几乎没有证据表明性别组之间以及暴力死亡与非暴力死亡受害者之间存在差异项目功能。