• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过消化道选择性去污降低儿科重症监护期间的定植和感染率。

Reduction of colonization and infection rate during pediatric intensive care by selective decontamination of the digestive tract.

作者信息

Zobel G, Kuttnig M, Grubbauer H M, Semmelrock H J, Thiel W

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1991 Oct;19(10):1242-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199110000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199110000-00005
PMID:1914480
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of two different antibiotic regimes on the colonization and infection rates of critically ill pediatric patients.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized trial.

SETTING

A pediatric ICU in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifty critically ill pediatric patients who required intensive care for at least 4 days were randomly allocated to either the selective parenteral and enteral antisepsis regimen (treatment group, n = 25) or the control group (n = 25).

INTERVENTIONS

The treatment group received oral nonabsorbable antimicrobial agents (polymyxin E, gentamicin, and amphotericin B) and parenteral cefotaxime, whereas the control group received either perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis or antibiotic therapy according to clinical or microbiological evidence of infection.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable for age, body weight, sex, and severity of illness. Colonization with Gram-negative microorganisms and yeasts in the oropharynx, and digestive and respiratory tracts increased rapidly up to 52% in the control group, whereas there was no colonization with these microorganisms in the treatment group. The occurrence rates of acquired secondary infections in the control and treatment groups were 36% and 8%, respectively (p less than .025). There were no differences between groups in the duration of intensive care or mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Selective oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal decontamination combined with systemic cefotaxime application allows for a significant reduction of the colonization rate with Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts in critically ill pediatric patients undergoing prolonged intensive care. In addition, it significantly reduces the Gram-negative infection rate of the respiratory system. However, this therapeutic approach does not alter ICU length of stay or mortality rate.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同抗生素治疗方案对危重症儿科患者定植和感染率的影响。

设计

一项前瞻性随机试验。

地点

一所大学医院的儿科重症监护病房。

患者

50例需要至少4天重症监护的危重症儿科患者被随机分为选择性肠外和肠内抗菌方案组(治疗组,n = 25)或对照组(n = 25)。

干预措施

治疗组接受口服不吸收抗菌药物(多粘菌素E、庆大霉素和两性霉素B)和肠外头孢噻肟,而对照组根据感染的临床或微生物学证据接受围手术期抗生素预防或抗生素治疗。

结果

两组在年龄、体重、性别和疾病严重程度方面具有可比性。对照组口咽、消化道和呼吸道革兰氏阴性微生物和酵母菌的定植迅速增加,高达52%,而治疗组未出现这些微生物的定植。对照组和治疗组获得性继发感染的发生率分别为36%和8%(p < 0.025)。两组在重症监护持续时间或死亡率方面无差异。

结论

选择性口咽和胃肠道去污联合全身应用头孢噻肟可显著降低接受长期重症监护的危重症儿科患者革兰氏阴性菌和酵母菌的定植率。此外,它还显著降低了呼吸系统革兰氏阴性菌感染率。然而,这种治疗方法不会改变重症监护病房住院时间或死亡率。

相似文献

1
Reduction of colonization and infection rate during pediatric intensive care by selective decontamination of the digestive tract.通过消化道选择性去污降低儿科重症监护期间的定植和感染率。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Oct;19(10):1242-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199110000-00005.
2
Randomized, controlled trial of selective digestive decontamination in 600 mechanically ventilated patients in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit.在一个多学科重症监护病房对600例机械通气患者进行选择性消化道去污的随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Jan;25(1):63-71. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00014.
3
Prevention of infection in critically ill patients by selective decontamination of the digestive tract.通过消化道选择性去污预防重症患者感染
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Oct 1;117(7):545-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-7-545.
4
[Selective digestive decontamination in patients under reanimation].[复苏患者的选择性消化道去污]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1994;13(6):826-38. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(05)80920-7.
5
Selective oropharyngeal decontamination versus selective digestive decontamination in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.危重症患者中选择性口咽去污与选择性消化道去污的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Jul 14;9:3617-24. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S84587. eCollection 2015.
6
Prevention of nosocomial infection in critically ill patients by selective decontamination of the digestive tract. A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study.通过消化道选择性去污预防重症患者的医院感染。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(7):398-404. doi: 10.1007/BF01694341.
7
Effect of selective flora suppression on colonization, infection, and mortality in critically ill patients: a one-year, prospective consecutive study.选择性菌群抑制对重症患者定植、感染及死亡率的影响:一项为期一年的前瞻性连续研究。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Apr;19(4):463-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199104000-00003.
8
Prevention of colonization and infection in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized study.危重症患者定植和感染的预防:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Crit Care Med. 1988 Nov;16(11):1087-93. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198811000-00001.
9
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in multiple trauma patients--is there a role? Results of a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial.多发伤患者消化道选择性去污——有作用吗?一项前瞻性、双盲、随机试验的结果
Crit Care Med. 1994 Jan;22(1):33-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199401000-00010.
10
Decreased mortality rate and length of hospital stay in surgical intensive care unit patients with successful selective decontamination of the gut.成功进行肠道选择性去污的外科重症监护病房患者的死亡率降低,住院时间缩短。
Crit Care Med. 1993 Nov;21(11):1692-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199311000-00018.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-duration selective decontamination of the digestive tract infection control does not contribute to increased antimicrobial resistance burden in a pilot cluster randomised trial (the ARCTIC Study).短程选择性消化道去污染对感染控制并未增加抗生素耐药负担:一项试点性集群随机试验(ARCTIC 研究)
Gut. 2024 May 10;73(6):910-921. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330851.
2
Topical antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving mechanical ventilation.局部用抗生素预防成人机械通气患者的呼吸道感染和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 22;1(1):CD000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000022.pub4.
3
Impact of selective digestive decontamination on respiratory tract Candida among patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. A meta-analysis.
选择性消化道去污对疑似呼吸机相关性肺炎患者呼吸道念珠菌的影响。一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;35(7):1121-35. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2643-7. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
4
Topical antibiotics as a major contextual hazard toward bacteremia within selective digestive decontamination studies: a meta-analysis.在选择性消化道去污研究中,局部使用抗生素是导致菌血症的主要背景危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 31;14:714. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0714-x.
5
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: the mechanism of action is control of gut overgrowth.选择性消化道去污:作用机制是控制肠道过度生长。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Nov;38(11):1738-50. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2690-1. Epub 2012 Sep 22.
6
Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care.抗生素预防用于降低接受重症监护的成年人的呼吸道感染和死亡率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000022.pub3.
7
Impact of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on fungal carriage and infection: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.消化道选择性去污对真菌携带及感染的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul;31(7):898-910. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2654-9. Epub 2005 May 14.
8
Prevention of nosocomial infection in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through the use of selective digestive decontamination.通过使用选择性消化道去污预防儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的医院感染。
Eur J Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;14(7):719-27. doi: 10.1023/a:1007487330893.
9
Prophylaxis with enteral antibiotics in ventilated patients: selective decontamination or selective cross-infection?机械通气患者使用肠内抗生素进行预防:选择性去污还是选择性交叉感染?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Apr;39(4):941-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.4.941.
10
Pathogen and host differences in bacterial adherence to human buccal epithelial cells in a northeast Brazilian community.巴西东北部一个社区中细菌对人颊上皮细胞黏附的病原体与宿主差异
Infect Immun. 1992 Nov;60(11):4793-800. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.11.4793-4800.1992.