Suppr超能文献

九种检测大肠杆菌肠毒素不同方法的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of nine different methods for detecting enterotoxin of Escherichia coli.

作者信息

Zhu Q Y, Li L Q, Lin W M, Li Y T, Zhang P Y, Huang Y T

机构信息

Taiyuan Children's Hospital.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 1991 Aug;104(8):669-72.

PMID:1914635
Abstract

Nine different methods for detecting enterotoxin of Escherichia coli were studied and compared. We found rabbit ileal-loop test and suckling mouse assay were both quite accurate and reliable for detecting heat labile toxin (LT) and heat stable toxin (ST) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). Mouse ileal-loop test was simple, but its sensitivity and specificity were comparatively low. CHO cell-culture assay might be more sensitive and specific. LT-DNA probe was the most sensitive and specific method. In practical application, PIHT (plate immunohemolytic test), Biken's, SPA-CoA and ELISA methods are recognized as simple, rapid, sensitive and specific methods for detecting ETEC-LT. These methods can be selected for use in clinical laboratory.

摘要

对九种检测大肠杆菌肠毒素的不同方法进行了研究和比较。我们发现兔肠袢试验和乳鼠试验对于检测产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)的不耐热毒素(LT)和耐热毒素(ST)都相当准确和可靠。小鼠肠袢试验操作简单,但其敏感性和特异性相对较低。CHO细胞培养试验可能更具敏感性和特异性。LT-DNA探针是最敏感和特异的方法。在实际应用中,平板免疫溶血试验(PIHT)、狄克试验、葡萄球菌A蛋白-辅酶A法和酶联免疫吸附测定法被认为是检测ETEC-LT的简单、快速、灵敏和特异的方法。这些方法可选择用于临床实验室。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验