Martin James C, Brown Nicholas A T
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Utah, 250 S. 1850 E. Room 241, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0920, USA.
J Biomech. 2009 Mar 11;42(4):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.11.015. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
Cycling power decreases substantially during a maximal cycling trial of just 30s. It is not known whether movement patterns and joint powers produced at each joint decrease to a similar extent or if each joint exhibits an individual fatigue profile. Changes in movement patterns and/or joint powers associated with overall task fatigue could arise from several different mechanisms or from a complex interplay of these mechanisms. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the changes in movement and power at each joint during a fatiguing cycling trial. Thirteen trained cyclists performed a 30s maximal cycling trial on an isokinetic cycle ergometer at 120rpm. Pedal forces and limb kinematics were recorded. Joint powers were calculated using a sagittal plane inverse dynamics model and averaged for the initial, middle, and final three second intervals of the trial, and normalized to initial values. Relative ankle plantar flexion power was significantly less than all other joint actions at the middle interval (51+/-5% of initial power; p=0.013). Relative ankle plantar flexion power for the final interval (37+/-3%) was significantly less than the relative knee flexion and hip extension power (p=0.010). Relative knee extension power (41+/-5%) was significantly less than relative hip extension power (55+/-4%) during the final three second interval (p=0.045). Knee flexion power (47+/-5%) did not differ from relative hip extension power (p=0.06). These changes in power were accompanied by a decrease in time spent extending by each joint with fatigue (i.e., decreased duty cycle, p<0.03). While central mechanisms may have played a role across all joints, because the ankle fatigued more than the hip and knee joints, either peripheral muscle fatigue or changes in motor control strategies were identified as the potential mechanisms for joint-specific fatigue during a maximal 30s cycling trial.
在仅30秒的最大强度骑行测试中,骑行功率会大幅下降。目前尚不清楚每个关节产生的运动模式和关节功率是否会以相似的程度下降,或者每个关节是否呈现出个体疲劳特征。与整体任务疲劳相关的运动模式和/或关节功率的变化可能源于几种不同的机制,或者是这些机制的复杂相互作用。本研究的目的是确定在疲劳骑行测试期间每个关节的运动和功率变化。13名训练有素的自行车运动员在等动自行车测力计上以120转/分钟的速度进行了30秒的最大强度骑行测试。记录了踏板力和肢体运动学数据。使用矢状面逆动力学模型计算关节功率,并在测试的初始、中间和最后三个两秒间隔内进行平均,并归一化为初始值。在中间间隔时,相对踝关节跖屈功率显著低于所有其他关节动作(为初始功率的51±5%;p = 0.013)。最后间隔的相对踝关节跖屈功率(37±3%)显著低于相对膝关节屈曲和髋关节伸展功率(p = 0.010)。在最后三个两秒间隔内,相对膝关节伸展功率(41±5%)显著低于相对髋关节伸展功率(55±4%)(p = 0.045)。膝关节屈曲功率(47±5%)与相对髋关节伸展功率无差异(p = 0.06)。随着疲劳的出现,这些功率变化伴随着每个关节伸展时间的减少(即工作周期减少,p < 0.03)。虽然中枢机制可能在所有关节中都发挥了作用,但由于踝关节比髋关节和膝关节更容易疲劳,因此在30秒最大强度骑行测试期间,外周肌肉疲劳或运动控制策略的变化被确定为关节特异性疲劳的潜在机制。