Thomas Gregory S, Thompson Randall C, Miyamoto Michael I, Ip Tze K, Rice Deborah L, Milikien Douglas, Lieu Hsiao D, Mathur Vandana S
Cardiology Division, Mission Internal Medical Group, 26800 Crown Valley Pkwy, Suite 120, Mission Viejo, CA 92691-6331, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s12350-008-9001-9. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
Although vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is increasingly performed with exercise, adenosine A(2A) receptor agonists have not been studied with exercise.
To determine the safety of administering regadenoson during exercise and, secondarily, to evaluate image quality, patient acceptance, and detection of perfusion defects.
Patients requiring pharmacologic MPI received a standard adenosine-supine protocol (AdenoSup, n = 60) and were then randomized (2:1) in a double-blind manner to low-level exercise with bolus intravenous injection of regadenoson (RegEx, n = 39) or placebo (PlcEx, n = 21).
Adverse events occurred in 95%, 77%, and 33% of patients receiving AdenoSup, RegEx, and PlcEx, respectively. Peak heart rate was 13 beats per minute (bpm) and 21 bpm greater following RegEx compared to that following PlcEx and AdenoSup, respectively (P = .006 and <.001). Change from baseline in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), change from baseline to nadir SBP, and percentage of patients with a decline in SBP by > or = 20 mm Hg showed no important differences between RegEx and PlcEx. No occurrences of 2nd degree or higher AV block were observed following RegEx or PlcEx; one patient developed 2nd degree AV block following AdenoSup. The mean heart-to-liver and heart-to-gut ratios were improved on RegEx vs AdenoSup: 0.85 (0.34) vs 0.65 (0.26), P < .001 and 1.1 (0.36) vs 0.97 (0.34), P < .001, respectively. Compared to AdenoSup, 70% of patients felt RegEx was much or somewhat better.
Combining regadenoson with low-level exercise is feasible, well tolerated, and associated with fewer side effects compared to AdenoSup.
尽管血管扩张剂负荷心肌灌注成像(MPI)越来越多地采用运动负荷进行,但腺苷A(2A)受体激动剂尚未在运动负荷下进行研究。
确定运动时给予瑞加腺苷的安全性,其次评估图像质量、患者接受度以及灌注缺损的检测情况。
需要进行药物负荷MPI的患者接受标准的腺苷卧位方案(AdenoSup,n = 60),然后以双盲方式按2:1随机分为两组,一组为静脉推注瑞加腺苷的低水平运动组(RegEx,n = 39),另一组为安慰剂组(PlcEx,n = 21)。
接受AdenoSup、RegEx和PlcEx的患者中不良事件发生率分别为95%、77%和33%。与PlcEx和AdenoSup相比,RegEx后的心率峰值分别高13次/分钟(bpm)和21次/分钟(P = 0.006和<0.001)。RegEx和PlcEx之间,平均收缩压(SBP)较基线的变化、从基线到最低SBP的变化以及SBP下降≥20 mmHg的患者百分比均无显著差异。RegEx或PlcEx后均未观察到二度或更高程度的房室传导阻滞;一名患者在AdenoSup后出现二度房室传导阻滞。与AdenoSup相比,RegEx时平均心-肝和心-肠比值有所改善:分别为0.85(0.34)对0.65(0.26),P < 0.001和1.1(0.36)对0.97(0.34),P < 0.001。与AdenoSup相比,70%的患者认为RegEx要好得多或稍好一些。
与AdenoSup相比,瑞加腺苷与低水平运动相结合是可行的,耐受性良好,且副作用较少。