Suppr超能文献

无症状性颈动脉狭窄的血管内颈动脉支架置入术与早期冠状动脉旁路移植术:长期预后和神经事件

Endovascular carotid artery stenting and early coronary artery bypass grafting for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: long-term outcomes and neurologic events.

作者信息

Ranaweera Priyantha S, Bigelow Brian C, Leary Megan C, de la Torre Ralph, Sellke Frank, Garcia Lawrence A

机构信息

Division of Interventional Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):139-42. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21824.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of patients with asymptomatic critical carotid artery stenoses prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has no clear consensus. Further, optimal timing for surgical coronary revascularization has not been defined after or with any carotid revascularization.

METHODS

We reviewed the data from 2002 to 2007, of all patients in our institution who underwent carotid artery stenting (CAS) for critical carotid artery stenoses, prior to CABG. Twenty patients with critical carotid disease were referred for preoperative carotid intervention prior to CABG. Carotid duplex demonstrated evidence of critical stenoses in all patients. Patients were serially assessed by a stroke neurologist before and after the procedure (immediately, at 24 hr, at 48 hr, immediately following CABG, and at 30 days). We evaluated initial procedural success as well as freedom from periprocedure stroke.

RESULTS

Prior to undergoing CABG, 20 patients had stents placed in a single carotid artery for unilateral asymptomatic critical carotid artery stenoses. All the procedures, except one, were performed with distal embolic protection. Patients received aspirin and clopidogrel. There were no strokes or deaths up to a mean follow up of 486 days. The mean time from CAS to CABG performed in the same hospital admission was 6.4 days. Transfusion rates were not excessive despite dual antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, endovascular extracranial CAS for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis by experienced operators, prior to CABG was safe and permitted early coronary revascularization without increased risk of strokes or death in this high-risk cardiovascular patient population.

摘要

背景

对于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)前无症状性严重颈动脉狭窄患者的最佳管理尚无明确共识。此外,在任何颈动脉血运重建术后或同时进行外科冠状动脉血运重建的最佳时机也未明确。

方法

我们回顾了2002年至2007年我院所有在CABG前因严重颈动脉狭窄接受颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的患者的数据。20例患有严重颈动脉疾病的患者在CABG前被转诊进行术前颈动脉干预。所有患者的颈动脉双功超声均显示有严重狭窄的证据。在手术前后(即刻、24小时、48小时、CABG后即刻和30天)由卒中神经科医生对患者进行连续评估。我们评估了初始手术成功率以及围手术期无卒中情况。

结果

在进行CABG之前,20例患者在单一颈动脉置入支架以治疗单侧无症状性严重颈动脉狭窄。除1例手术外,所有手术均采用远端栓子保护装置。患者接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗。平均随访486天,无卒中或死亡病例。在同一住院期间,从CAS到CABG的平均时间为6.4天。尽管采用了双联抗血小板治疗,但输血率并不高。

结论

在实际临床环境中,由经验丰富的操作者在CABG前对无症状性颈动脉狭窄进行血管内颅外CAS是安全的,并且允许早期进行冠状动脉血运重建,在这一高危心血管患者群体中不会增加卒中或死亡风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验