• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间辨别实证解释与理论解释的比较。

A comparison of empirical and theoretical explanations of temporal discrimination.

作者信息

Guilhardi Paulo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jan;35(1):51-73. doi: 10.1037/a0013259.

DOI:10.1037/a0013259
PMID:19159162
Abstract

The empirical goals were to describe the behavior of rats trained on multiple temporal discriminations and to use these descriptions to predict behavior observed under new training conditions. The theoretical goals were to fit a quantitative theory to behavior from one training condition, estimate parameters for the intervening perception, memory, and decision processes, and use these parameters to predict behavior observed under new conditions. Twenty-four rats were trained on a multiple-peak-interval procedure with two stimuli that were presented individually (Stimulus A and B), or in compound (Compound AB); either different responses (Experiment 1) or the same response (Experiment 2) were reinforced during the presentations of Stimulus A, Stimulus B, and Compound AB. The patterns of correct and stimulus-error responses during Stimulus A and Stimulus B (Experiment 1) were used as elements that, with summation rules, predicted behavior under new conditions (Compound AB, Experiment 1; Stimulus A, Stimulus B, and Compound AB, Experiment 2). A comparison of the success of the empirical and theoretical goals supported the use of a quantitative theory of behavior to explain the data.

摘要

实证目标是描述接受多种时间辨别训练的大鼠的行为,并利用这些描述来预测在新训练条件下观察到的行为。理论目标是将一种定量理论与一种训练条件下的行为相拟合,估计中间的感知、记忆和决策过程的参数,并利用这些参数来预测在新条件下观察到的行为。24只大鼠接受了多峰间隔程序训练,有两种刺激,分别单独呈现(刺激A和B)或复合呈现(复合刺激AB);在刺激A、刺激B和复合刺激AB呈现期间,强化不同的反应(实验1)或相同的反应(实验2)。刺激A和刺激B(实验1)期间正确和刺激错误反应的模式被用作元素,通过求和规则来预测新条件下(复合刺激AB,实验1;刺激A、刺激B和复合刺激AB,实验2)的行为。对实证目标和理论目标成功程度的比较支持使用行为定量理论来解释数据。

相似文献

1
A comparison of empirical and theoretical explanations of temporal discrimination.时间辨别实证解释与理论解释的比较。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jan;35(1):51-73. doi: 10.1037/a0013259.
2
The effect of stimulus discriminability on strategies for learning multiple temporal discriminations.刺激可辨别性对学习多种时间辨别策略的影响。
Behav Processes. 2010 May;84(1):476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
3
Differences between simultaneous and blocked training detected by a transfer test.通过迁移测试检测到的同时训练和分组训练之间的差异。
Behav Processes. 2007 Jun;75(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.020. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
4
What starts an internal clock?是什么启动了生物钟?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Jul;10(3):273-96.
5
Simultaneous temporal processing.同步时间处理
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Jan;10(1):1-29.
6
Stimulus salience and negative patterning.刺激显著性与负性模式。
Q J Exp Psychol B. 1995 Feb;48(1):67-83.
7
Applications of timing theories to a peak procedure.时间理论在峰值程序中的应用。
Behav Processes. 2007 Jun;75(2):188-98. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 4.
8
A model for the time-order error in contrast discrimination.一种对比度辨别中时间顺序误差的模型。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun;64(6):1221-48. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.540018. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
9
The role of temporal generalization in a temporal discrimination task.时间泛化在时间辨别任务中的作用。
Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
10
A non-spatial, stimulus-comparison working memory task in rats and disruption by scopolamine.大鼠的一种非空间刺激比较工作记忆任务及东莨菪碱对其的干扰。
Neuroscience. 2007 Mar 30;145(3):955-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.12.055. Epub 2007 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The generality of empirical and theoretical explanations of behavior.行为的经验性和理论性解释的一般性。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):205-15. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.013. Epub 2009 Feb 14.