Kudritskiĭ Iu K, Karpov V I, Georgievskiĭ A B
Gig Sanit. 1991 May(5):53-6.
A question has been raised on the necessity to substitute the hypothesis of the biological effectiveness of ionizing irradiations as a paradigm of radiation hygiene for the linear--++non-threshold hypothesis. A comparison of the methodological substantiation fo both hypotheses and a conception of "acceptable risk" has been carried out. It is suggested, that the possibility of theoretical substantiation of setting standards for the radiation factor on the basis of adaptational hypothesis be acknowledge instead of the linear--++non-threshold conception which has lost its historic significance.
对于用线性无阈值假说来替代作为辐射卫生学范例的电离辐射生物效应假说的必要性，人们提出了一个问题。已对这两种假说的方法学依据以及“可接受风险”的概念进行了比较。有人建议，应承认基于适应性假说为辐射因素制定标准的理论依据的可能性，而不是已失去其历史意义的线性无阈值概念。
