Panescu Dorin, Naware Mihir, Siou Jeff, Nabutovsky Yelena, Holmstrom Nils, Blomqvist Andreas, Shah Riddhi, Gutfinger Dan, Khoury Dirar
St. Jude Medical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:5668-70. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650500.
We investigated trends in intrathoracic impedance measured between multiple implanted electrodes for monitoring pulmonary edema secondary to congestive heart failure (CHF) in an experimental model.
Biventricular ICDs were implanted in 16 dogs and 5 sheep. Continuous RV pacing (230- 250 bpm) was applied over several weeks. Meanwhile, impedance was measured every hour along 4 intrathoracic and 2 intracardiac vectors. Four cardiogenic impedance vectors were also monitored. Cardiac function was assessed biweekly by catheterization and echocardiography. Left atrial (LA) pressure was measured daily by an implanted LA pressure sensor.
All animals developed CHF after 2-4 weeks of pacing as evidenced by changes in function (EF, 52 vs. 34%; LV end-diastolic volume, 65 vs. 97 ml; LV end-diastolic pressure, 7 vs. 16 mmHg; LA volume, 17 vs. 33 ml; LA pressure, 7 vs. 26 mmHg), clinical symptoms, or autopsy. Steady state impedance decreased during CHF: LV-Can, 17+/-9%; LV-RV, 15+/-8%; LV-RA, 13+/-6%; RV-Can, 13+/-8%; RVcoil-Can, 8+/-6%; RA-Can, 6+/-6%. Change in LV-Can impedance was greater than that of RA-Can, RV-Can, and RVcoil-Can (P0.05). LV-Can impedance correlated well with LA pressure (r(2)=0.73), while RV-Can and RVcoil-Can were weakly correlated (r(2)=0.43 and r(2)=0.52, respectively). Changes in LV-RV and LV-RA impedances were also larger than those of RVcoil-Can and RA-Can (P0.05). Meanwhile, all impedances were associated with circadian variability at baseline (5+/-2%) which diminished during CHF (2+/-1%); P=0.02. Furthermore, significant variations were observed in cardiogenic impedances during progression into CHF as evidenced by reduced peak-to-peak amplitude and increased fractionation of the signals.
All impedance vectors decreased during CHF. Impedance measurement employing left heart sensors correlated well wit- - h LA pressure, and may improve detection of CHF onset compared to sensing by RA or RV leads alone. This approach has important clinical implications for managing heart failure patients in the ambulatory setting.
我们在一个实验模型中研究了多个植入电极间测量的胸腔内阻抗的变化趋势,以监测充血性心力衰竭(CHF)继发的肺水肿。
将双心室植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)植入16只犬和5只羊体内。持续右心室起搏(230 - 250次/分钟)持续数周。同时,每小时沿4个胸腔内向量和2个心内向量测量阻抗。还监测了4个心源性阻抗向量。每两周通过导管插入术和超声心动图评估心脏功能。每天通过植入的左心房压力传感器测量左心房(LA)压力。
起搏2 - 4周后,所有动物均出现CHF,表现为功能变化(射血分数,52%对34%;左心室舒张末期容积,65 ml对97 ml;左心室舒张末期压力,7 mmHg对16 mmHg;左心房容积,17 ml对33 ml;左心房压力,7 mmHg对26 mmHg)、临床症状或尸检结果。CHF期间稳态阻抗降低:左心室 - 除颤器罐,17±9%;左心室 - 右心室,15±8%;左心室 - 右心房,13±6%;右心室 - 除颤器罐,13±8%;右心室线圈 - 除颤器罐,8±6%;右心房 - 除颤器罐,6±6%。左心室 - 除颤器罐阻抗的变化大于右心房 - 除颤器罐、右心室 - 除颤器罐和右心室线圈 - 除颤器罐(P<0.05)。左心室 - 除颤器罐阻抗与左心房压力相关性良好(r² = 0.73),而右心室 - 除颤器罐和右心室线圈 - 除颤器罐相关性较弱(分别为r² = 0.43和r² = 0.52)。左心室 - 右心室和左心室 - 右心房阻抗的变化也大于右心室线圈 - 除颤器罐和右心房 - 除颤器罐(P<0.05)。同时,所有阻抗在基线时均与昼夜变化相关(5±2%),在CHF期间减小(2±1%);P = 0.02。此外,在进展为CHF的过程中,心源性阻抗出现显著变化,表现为峰峰值幅度降低和信号碎片化增加。
CHF期间所有阻抗向量均降低。采用左心传感器进行阻抗测量与左心房压力相关性良好,与单独使用右心房或右心室导联进行传感相比,可能改善CHF发作的检测。这种方法对门诊环境中管理心力衰竭患者具有重要的临床意义。