Lefebvre-Roque Maxime, Kremmer Elisabeth, Gilch Sabine, Zou Wen-Quan, Féraudet Cécile, Gilles Chantal Mourton, Salès Nicole, Grassi Jacques, Gambetti Pierluigi, Baron Thierry, Schätzl Hermann, Lasmézas Corinne Ida
Department of Infectology, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, Florida 33458, USA.
Prion. 2007 Jul-Sep;1(3):198-206. doi: 10.4161/pri.1.3.4870. Epub 2007 Jul 15.
The absence of specific immune response is a hallmark of prion diseases. However, in vitro and in vivo experiments have provided evidence that an anti-PrP humoral response could have beneficial effects. Prophylactic passive immunization performed at the time of infection delayed or prevented disease. Nonetheless, the potential therapeutic effect of PrP antibodies administered shortly before the clinical signs has never been tested in vivo. Moreover, a recent study showed the potential toxicity of PrP antibodies administered intracerebrally. We aimed at evaluating the effect of a prolonged intracerebral anti-PrP antibody administration at the time of neuroinvasion in BSE infected Tg20 mice. Unexpectedly, despite a good penetration of the antibodies in the brain parenchyma, the treatment was not protective against the development of BSE. Instead, it led to an extensive neuronal loss, strong astrogliosis and microglial activation. Since this effect was observed after injection of anti-PrP antibodies as whole IgGs, F(ab')(2) or Fab fragments, the toxicity was directly related to the ability of the antibodies to recognize native PrP and to the intracerebral concentration achieved, and not to the Fc portion or the divalence of the antibodies. This experiment shows that a prolonged treatment with anti-PrP antibodies by the intracerebral route can induce severe side-effects and calls for caution with regard to the use of similar approaches for late therapeutic interventions in humans.
缺乏特异性免疫反应是朊病毒疾病的一个标志。然而,体外和体内实验已提供证据表明,抗朊蛋白(PrP)体液反应可能具有有益作用。在感染时进行的预防性被动免疫可延缓或预防疾病。尽管如此,在临床症状出现前不久给予PrP抗体的潜在治疗效果从未在体内进行过测试。此外,最近一项研究显示了脑内注射PrP抗体的潜在毒性。我们旨在评估在牛海绵状脑病(BSE)感染的Tg20小鼠神经侵袭时长期脑内注射抗PrP抗体的效果。出乎意料的是,尽管抗体在脑实质中有良好的渗透,但该治疗对BSE的发展并无保护作用。相反,它导致了广泛的神经元丧失、强烈的星形胶质细胞增生和小胶质细胞激活。由于在注射抗PrP抗体的完整IgG、F(ab')(2)或Fab片段后均观察到这种效应,毒性直接与抗体识别天然PrP的能力以及所达到的脑内浓度有关,而与抗体的Fc部分或二价性无关。该实验表明,通过脑内途径长期用抗PrP抗体治疗可诱导严重的副作用,并呼吁在人类后期治疗干预中使用类似方法时要谨慎。