Gandini Delphine, Lemaire Patrick, Michel Bernard François
Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, Bâtiment 9, Case D, Marseille 13331, France.
Brain Cogn. 2009 Jun;70(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
Forty young adults, 40 healthy older adults, and 39 probable AD patients were asked to estimate small (e.g., 25) and large (e.g., 60) collections of dots in a choice condition and in two no-choice conditions. Participants could choose between benchmark and anchoring strategies on each collection of dots in the choice condition and were required to use either benchmark or anchoring on all configurations in the no-choice conditions (one per strategy). The benchmark strategy involves visual estimation processes whereas the anchoring strategy involves both enumeration and estimation processes. Results showed that strategy use was influenced by collection, participant, and strategy characteristics. Age-related and dementia-related differences were found in both strategy use and strategy execution. The findings have implications for our understanding of aging effects in approximate quantification, strategic variations in Alzheimer's patients, and sources of cognitive decline during early stages of Alzheimer's disease.
40名年轻成年人、40名健康的老年人以及39名疑似阿尔茨海默病患者被要求在选择条件和两种非选择条件下估计小(例如25个)和大(例如60个)的点集。在选择条件下,参与者可以在每种点集上在基准策略和锚定策略之间进行选择,并且在非选择条件下(每种策略各一种)被要求在所有配置上使用基准策略或锚定策略。基准策略涉及视觉估计过程,而锚定策略涉及计数和估计过程。结果表明,策略的使用受到集合、参与者和策略特征的影响。在策略使用和策略执行方面都发现了与年龄相关和与痴呆相关的差异。这些发现对于我们理解近似量化中的衰老效应、阿尔茨海默病患者的策略变化以及阿尔茨海默病早期认知衰退的根源具有启示意义。