Suppr超能文献

基于一对一访谈的自动文本分析,澳大利亚专业组织、政府机构、行业组织和消费者组织对处方药样品包的认知情况。

Perception of prescription medicine sample packs among Australian professional, government, industry, and consumer organizations, based on automated textual analysis of one-on-one interviews.

作者信息

Kyle Greg J, Nissen Lisa, Tett Susan

机构信息

University of Queensland, School of Pharmacy, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2008 Dec;30(12):2461-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prescription medicine samples provided by pharmaceutical companies are predominantly newer and more expensive products. The range of samples provided to practices may not represent the drugs that the doctors desire to have available. Few studies have used a qualitative design to explore the reasons behind sample use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the opinions of a variety of Australian key informants about prescription medicine samples, using a qualitative methodology.

METHODS

Twenty-three organizations involved in quality use of medicines in Australia were identified, based on the authors' previous knowledge. Each organization was invited to nominate 1 or 2 representatives to participate in semistructured interviews utilizing seeding questions. Each interview was recorded and transcribed verbatim. Leximancer v2.25 text analysis software (Leximancer Pty Ltd., Jindalee, Queensland, Australia) was used for textual analysis. The top 10 concepts from each analysis group were interrogated back to the original transcript text to determine the main emergent opinions.

RESULTS

A total of 18 key interviewees representing 16 organizations participated. Samples, patient, doctor, and medicines were the major concepts among general opinions about samples. The concept drug became more frequent and the concept companies appeared when marketing issues were discussed. The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and cost were more prevalent in discussions about alternative sample distribution models, indicating interviewees were cognizant of budgetary implications. Key interviewee opinions added richness to the single-word concepts extracted by Leximancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants recognized that prescription medicine samples have an influence on quality use of medicines and play a role in the marketing of medicines. They also believed that alternative distribution systems for samples could provide benefits. The cost of a noncommercial system for distributing samples or starter packs was a concern. These data will be used to design further research investigating alternative models for distribution of samples.

摘要

背景

制药公司提供的处方药样品主要是更新、更昂贵的产品。提供给医疗机构的样品范围可能并不代表医生希望能获取的药物。很少有研究采用定性设计来探究样品使用背后的原因。

目的

本研究旨在运用定性方法,探究澳大利亚各类关键信息提供者对处方药样品的看法。

方法

根据作者先前的了解,确定了23个参与澳大利亚合理用药的组织。邀请每个组织提名1或2名代表参加使用引导性问题的半结构化访谈。每次访谈都进行录音并逐字转录。使用Leximancer v2.25文本分析软件(Leximancer私人有限公司,澳大利亚昆士兰州金达利)进行文本分析。将每个分析组中排名前10的概念反馈至原始转录文本,以确定主要的新出现观点。

结果

共有来自16个组织的18名关键受访者参与。样品、患者、医生和药物是关于样品的总体看法中的主要概念。在讨论营销问题时,“药物”概念出现得更频繁,“公司”概念也出现了。在关于替代样品分发模式的讨论中,澳大利亚药品福利计划和成本更为普遍,这表明受访者意识到了预算影响。关键受访者的意见丰富了Leximancer提取的单字概念。

结论

参与者认识到处方药样品对合理用药有影响,并且在药品营销中发挥作用。他们还认为样品的替代分发系统可能会带来益处。用于分发样品或试用装的非商业系统的成本是一个关注点。这些数据将用于设计进一步的研究,调查样品分发的替代模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验