Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Jun;23(3):348-57. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
Intraoperative management directed to early extubation of children undergoing cardiac surgery has been suggested as a viable alternative to prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation. The authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of this approach in a randomized prospective trial.
A prospective randomized observational study.
A single university-affiliated hospital.
One hundred consecutive pediatric patients (age 1 month-15 years, weight 3.0-51 kg) requiring cardiac surgery. Patients younger than 1 month of age and those requiring mechanical ventilation before the operation were considered ineligible for the study.
Patients were randomly allocated to a group with anesthetic management and extubation in the operating room (early group [EG]) and a group with elective prolonged mechanical ventilation (control group [CG]).
A difference in outcome as reflected by the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and hospital lengths of stay and postoperative morbidity and mortality was analyzed. A separate analysis was performed in children younger than 3 years old. The extubation time in the CG was 25.0 +/- 26.9 hours. No differences in mortality, the need for re-exploration for bleeding, the need for reintubation, the incidence of abnormal chest radiographic findings, or cardiac and septic complications between groups were found. PICU and postoperative hospital lengths of stay were significantly shorter in patients in the EG (3.3 +/- 1.9 days in the EG v 5.8 +/- 4.1 in the CG, p < 0.001, and 7.4 +/- 2.9 days in the EG v 11.2 +/- 6.8 days in the CG, p = 0.009).
In children undergoing cardiac surgery, anesthetic management with early cessation of mechanical ventilation appears to be safe and decreases hospital and PICU length of stay. However, because the size of the study did not allow for the detection of possible differences in perioperative mortality, only a large multicenter study may provide a definite answer to this question. The present study may be treated as a pilot for such a trial.
有研究表明,对于接受心脏手术的患儿,术中管理指导早期拔管是一种可行的替代方案,可以替代术后长时间的机械通气。作者通过一项随机前瞻性试验评估了这种方法的安全性和有效性。
前瞻性随机观察性研究。
一家单一的大学附属医院。
100 名连续接受心脏手术的儿科患者(年龄 1 个月至 15 岁,体重 3.0-51kg)。年龄小于 1 个月和术前需要机械通气的患者被认为不符合研究条件。
患者随机分配到麻醉管理和手术室拔管组(早期组 [EG])和选择性延长机械通气组(对照组 [CG])。
分析了以儿科重症监护病房(PICU)和住院时间以及术后发病率和死亡率为反映的结果差异。对年龄小于 3 岁的儿童进行了单独分析。CG 组的拔管时间为 25.0 +/- 26.9 小时。两组之间的死亡率、出血需要再次探查、需要重新插管、异常胸部 X 线表现的发生率或心脏和脓毒症并发症均无差异。EG 组的 PICU 和术后住院时间明显短于 CG 组(EG 组为 3.3 +/- 1.9 天,CG 组为 5.8 +/- 4.1 天,p < 0.001;EG 组为 7.4 +/- 2.9 天,CG 组为 11.2 +/- 6.8 天,p = 0.009)。
在接受心脏手术的儿童中,停止机械通气的麻醉管理似乎是安全的,并可缩短住院和 PICU 的住院时间。然而,由于研究规模不足以发现围手术期死亡率的可能差异,只有大型多中心研究才能对此问题提供明确答案。本研究可作为此类试验的初步研究。