Wittchen Hans-Ulrich, Gloster Andrew, Beesdo Katja, Schönfeld Sabine, Perkonigg Axel
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universitaet Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
CNS Spectr. 2009 Jan;14(1 Suppl 1):5-12.
We reviewed epidemiological findings for the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and its core diagnostic features, focusing on whether epidemiology has been helpful in clarifying some of the critical diagnostic issues relevant to the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases. Though epidemiology has provided increasingly rich data and knowledge regarding prevalence and incidence, patterns of onset and course, comorbidity, and risk factors for traumatic experiences and posttraumatic stress, little systematic research has been performed specifically addressing such critical diagnostic issues. Particularly, unresolved concerns remain regarding the definition of trauma, duration and impairment/distress criteria, the distinctiveness of the PTSD-syndrome, and even the position of PTSD in the classification system of mental disorders. A further exploitation of the existing data, and an improvement of existing epidemiological methods, strategies, and assessments are likely to substantially contribute to the clarification of unresolved diagnostic issues.
我们回顾了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)诊断的流行病学研究结果及其核心诊断特征,重点关注流行病学是否有助于阐明与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》和《国际疾病分类》修订相关的一些关键诊断问题。尽管流行病学已提供了关于患病率、发病率、发病模式和病程、共病以及创伤经历和创伤后应激的危险因素等越来越丰富的数据和知识,但专门针对此类关键诊断问题的系统研究却很少。特别是,关于创伤的定义、持续时间和损害/痛苦标准、PTSD综合征的独特性,甚至PTSD在精神障碍分类系统中的地位等问题仍未得到解决。进一步利用现有数据,改进现有的流行病学方法、策略和评估,可能会极大地有助于澄清未解决的诊断问题。