Chan Louis K H, Hayward William G
Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):119-32. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.119.
In feature integration theory (FIT; A. Treisman & S. Sato, 1990), feature detection is driven by independent dimensional modules, and other searches are driven by a master map of locations that integrates dimensional information into salience signals. Although recent theoretical models have largely abandoned this distinction, some observed results are difficult to explain in its absence. The present study measured dimension-specific performance during detection and localization, tasks that require operation of dimensional modules and the master map, respectively. Results showed a dissociation between tasks in terms of both dimension-switching costs and cross-dimension attentional capture, reflecting a dimension-specific nature for detection tasks and a dimension-general nature for localization tasks. In a feature-discrimination task, results precluded an explanation based on response mode. These results are interpreted to support FIT's postulation that different mechanisms are involved in parallel and focal attention searches. This indicates that the FIT architecture should be adopted to explain the current results and that a variety of visual attention findings can be addressed within this framework.
在特征整合理论(FIT;A. 特雷斯曼和S. 佐藤,1990)中,特征检测由独立的维度模块驱动,而其他搜索则由一个位置主地图驱动,该地图将维度信息整合到显著性信号中。尽管最近的理论模型在很大程度上摒弃了这种区分,但在没有这种区分的情况下,一些观察结果很难解释。本研究测量了检测和定位过程中特定维度的表现,这两项任务分别需要维度模块和主地图的操作。结果表明,在维度切换成本和跨维度注意捕获方面,两项任务存在分离,这反映了检测任务的特定维度性质和定位任务的维度一般性质。在一项特征辨别任务中,结果排除了基于反应模式的解释。这些结果被解释为支持特征整合理论的假设,即平行和集中注意搜索涉及不同的机制。这表明应采用特征整合理论架构来解释当前结果,并且在这个框架内可以解决各种视觉注意发现。