Mardones Rodrigo, Lara Joaquin, Donndorff Agustin, Barnes Sunni, Stuart Michael J, Glick James, Trousdale Robert
Adult Reconstructive Surgery Hip/Knee, Hospital Militar de Santiago, Clinica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile.
Arthroscopy. 2009 Feb;25(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
The goal of this study was to compare open and arthroscopic surgical techniques for "cam-type" femoroacetabular impingement in terms of feasibility and reliability.
We used 5 fresh-frozen cadaver specimens (10 hips). Anteroposterior and cross-table radiographs were taken for each. The head-neck union diameter was measured for each. The amount of bone resection at the anterolateral quadrant of the head-neck union was planned for each, with specific references to width, length, depth, and position. One side was randomly assigned to the open group and the other to the arthroscopic group. Surgical time, position of the osteotomy, and variation of the length, width, and depth of the final osteotomy with respect to the proposed dimensions were compared.
In all specimens partial resection of the anterior-lateral femoral head-neck junction with improvement of the femoral head-neck offset was accomplished. A statistically significant difference (P < .05) was observed for surgical time between the open and arthroscopic groups (shorter in open group).
When comparing surgical precision, no statistically significant differences were found between the open and arthroscopic procedures in any of the measurements. The depth and width of the osteoplasty were reliably obtained by the arthroscopic technique. However, there was a tendency to underestimate the osteoplasty length with the arthroscopic procedure. Positioning the osteoplasty was also less reliable with the arthroscopic procedure than with the open procedure because of the tendency to place the osteoplasty more posterior and distally than intended.
Surgical resection of the femoral neck prominence and/or part of the anterolateral neck has been reported to improve femoral head offset and alleviate impingement. This study attempts to document the accuracy of this resection when done arthroscopically compared with an open procedure.
本研究的目的是比较开放手术和关节镜手术治疗“凸轮型”股骨髋臼撞击症的可行性和可靠性。
我们使用了5个新鲜冷冻尸体标本(10个髋关节)。对每个标本拍摄前后位和交叉台X线片。测量每个标本的头颈结合部直径。针对每个标本计划在头颈结合部前外侧象限进行的骨切除量,具体涉及宽度、长度、深度和位置。一侧随机分配到开放手术组,另一侧分配到关节镜手术组。比较手术时间、截骨位置以及最终截骨的长度、宽度和深度相对于计划尺寸的变化。
在所有标本中,均完成了股骨头颈结合部前外侧的部分切除,股骨头颈偏移得到改善。开放手术组和关节镜手术组之间的手术时间存在统计学显著差异(P <.05)(开放手术组较短)。
在比较手术精度时,开放手术和关节镜手术在任何测量中均未发现统计学显著差异。关节镜技术能够可靠地获得截骨成形术的深度和宽度。然而,关节镜手术有低估截骨成形术长度的趋势。由于截骨成形术的位置往往比预期更靠后和更靠下,关节镜手术在确定截骨成形术位置方面也不如开放手术可靠。
据报道,手术切除股骨颈突出部和/或前外侧颈的一部分可改善股骨头偏移并减轻撞击。本研究试图记录与开放手术相比,关节镜手术进行这种切除时的准确性。