Suppr超能文献

中重度 SCFE(股骨头骨骺滑脱)关节镜下骨成形术与开放颈骨切开术的比较:结果的回顾性分析。

Moderate and severe SCFE (Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis) arthroscopic osteoplasty vs open neck osteotomy-a retrospective analysis of results.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, S102RA, UK.

Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster, DN2 5LT, UK.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2375-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4069-6. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Abstract

AIM

We intend to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic osteoplasty with open neck osteotomy for correction of the hip impingement and improvement of hip function in children with moderate to severe healed Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE). Our aim is to verify if arthroscopic osteoplasty could achieve the same outcome as open procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the hospital hip database retrieved 187 cases of SCFE from 2006 to 2013. We found 12 patients underwent open neck osteotomy and deformity correction for moderate/ severe healed SCFE and ten underwent arthroscopic osteoplasty of the hip. We compared the outcomes between these groups.

RESULTS

In the arthroscopy cohort, the mean age at surgery was 15.8 years (range 13-19 years) and mean follow-up was 46.1 months (range 33-66 months). In the neck osteotomy group, the mean age at surgery was 14.6 years (11-20 years) and mean duration of follow-up was 49 months (36-60 months). The outcomes in arthroscopic osteoplasty group vs. open neck osteotomy were as follows: antero-posterior (AP) slip angle 9.2° (0.3°- 28.8°) vs 10.8° (1°-17.9°) (p = 0.0003), lateral slip angle 44.8° (36.5°-64.2°) vs 13.5° (1°-28.5°) (p = 0.00001), oblique plane deformity 47.1° (40.2°-53.5°) vs 16.7° (1°-28.6°) (p = 0.0003), alpha angle 61.88° (52.1°-123°) vs.34.6° (23.2°-45.6°) (p = 0.0003), anterior offset 0 mm (0 mm-2 mm) vs. 5 mm (2-13 mm) (p = 0.0003), modified Harris hip score (MHHS) 75.5 (58.75-96.8) vs. 90 (86.2-99) (p = 0.003), non-arthroplasty hip score (NAHS) 67.12 (18.75-100) vs. 92.1 (81.25-100) (p = 0.002), internal rotation 20° (0-20°) vs. 50° (30°-70°) (p = 0.0002), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Even though the radiographic correction lagged behind in the arthroscopic group, the functional outcomes achieved did convey the gain of function in this cohort. In carefully selected cases, arthroscopy could be a less invasive procedure which has desirable outcomes.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较关节镜下骨成形术与开放颈骨切开术治疗中度至重度愈合性股骨颈滑脱(SCFE)儿童髋关节撞击和改善髋关节功能的效果。我们的目的是验证关节镜下骨成形术是否可以达到与开放手术相同的效果。

患者和方法

我们对医院髋关节数据库进行回顾性分析,从 2006 年至 2013 年共检索到 187 例 SCFE 病例。我们发现 12 例患者接受了开放颈骨切开术和畸形矫正治疗中度/重度愈合性 SCFE,10 例患者接受了髋关节关节镜下骨成形术。我们比较了这些组之间的结果。

结果

在关节镜组中,手术时的平均年龄为 15.8 岁(范围 13-19 岁),平均随访时间为 46.1 个月(范围 33-66 个月)。在颈骨切开术组中,手术时的平均年龄为 14.6 岁(11-20 岁),平均随访时间为 49 个月(36-60 个月)。关节镜下骨成形术组与开放颈骨切开术组的结果如下:前后(AP)滑移角 9.2°(0.3°-28.8°)与 10.8°(1°-17.9°)(p=0.0003),外侧滑移角 44.8°(36.5°-64.2°)与 13.5°(1°-28.5°)(p=0.00001),斜平面畸形 47.1°(40.2°-53.5°)与 16.7°(1°-28.6°)(p=0.0003),α角 61.88°(52.1°-123°)与 34.6°(23.2°-45.6°)(p=0.0003),前偏移量 0 毫米(0 毫米-2 毫米)与 5 毫米(2-13 毫米)(p=0.0003),改良 Harris 髋关节评分(MHHS)75.5(58.75-96.8)与 90(86.2-99)(p=0.003),非关节置换髋关节评分(NAHS)67.12(18.75-100)与 92.1(81.25-100)(p=0.002),内旋 20°(0-20°)与 50°(30°-70°)(p=0.0002)。

结论

尽管关节镜组的放射学矫正滞后,但该组的功能结果确实传达了功能的改善。在精心选择的病例中,关节镜下手术可能是一种侵入性较小的手术,具有理想的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验