Escudier Bernard, Szczylik Cezary, Hutson Thomas E, Demkow Tomasz, Staehler Michael, Rolland Frédéric, Negrier Sylvie, Laferriere Nicole, Scheuring Urban J, Cella David, Shah Sonalee, Bukowski Ronald M
Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1280-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3342. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
An open-label, phase II study to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall best response, adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha-2a) in patients with untreated, advanced renal cancer.
A total of 189 patients were randomly assigned to oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily or to subcutaneous IFN-alpha-2a 9 million U three times weekly (period 1). Sorafenib patients who progressed were dose-escalated to 600 mg twice daily; IFN-alpha-2a patients who progressed were switched to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (period 2).
In period 1 PFS was similar for sorafenib-treated (n = 97; 5.7 months) and IFN-alpha-2a-treated patients (n = 92; 5.6 months); more sorafenib-treated patients had tumor shrinkage (68.2% v 39.0%). Common drug-related AEs (Grades > or = 3) for sorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction (11.3%), diarrhea (6.2%), and rash/desquamation (6.2%); for IFN-alpha-2a, these were fatigue (10.0%), nausea (3.3%), flu-like syndrome (2.2%), and anorexia (2.2%). Sorafenib-treated patients reported fewer symptoms, better quality of life (QOL), and greater treatment satisfaction. In period 2, 41.9% of patients who received sorafenib 600 mg twice daily (n = 43) experienced tumor reduction (median PFS, 3.6 months). After the switch to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, tumors were reduced in 76.2% of 50 patients (median PFS, 5.3 months). AEs were mostly grade 1 to 2; no increase in AEs of grades > or = 3 occurred after sorafenib dose escalation.
In this study, sorafenib resulted in similar PFS as IFN-alpha-2a in patients with untreated RCC. However, sorafenib-treated patients experienced greater rates of tumor size reduction, better QOL, and improved tolerability. Both dose escalation of sorafenib after progression and a switch to sorafenib after progression on IFN-alpha-2a resulted in clinical benefit.
一项开放标签的II期研究,旨在评估索拉非尼与干扰素α-2a(IFN-α-2a)相比,在未经治疗的晚期肾癌患者中的无进展生存期(PFS)、总体最佳反应、不良事件(AE)以及患者报告的结局。
总共189例患者被随机分配至口服索拉非尼400 mg,每日两次,或皮下注射IFN-α-2a 900万单位,每周三次(第1阶段)。疾病进展的索拉非尼治疗患者剂量增加至600 mg,每日两次;疾病进展的IFN-α-2a治疗患者换用索拉非尼400 mg,每日两次(第2阶段)。
在第1阶段,索拉非尼治疗组(n = 97;5.7个月)和IFN-α-2a治疗组(n = 92;5.6个月)的PFS相似;更多索拉非尼治疗患者出现肿瘤缩小(68.2%对39.0%)。索拉非尼常见的与药物相关的AE(≥3级)为手足皮肤反应(11.3%)、腹泻(6.2%)和皮疹/脱屑(6.2%);IFN-α-2a的这些AE为疲劳(10.0%)、恶心(3.3%)、流感样综合征(2.2%)和厌食(2.2%)。索拉非尼治疗患者报告的症状更少,生活质量(QOL)更好,治疗满意度更高。在第2阶段,每日两次接受600 mg索拉非尼治疗的患者中,41.9%(n = 43)出现肿瘤缩小(中位PFS,3.6个月)。换用每日两次400 mg索拉非尼后,50例患者中有76.2%出现肿瘤缩小(中位PFS,5.3个月)。AE大多为1至2级;索拉非尼剂量增加后,≥3级AE未增加。
在本研究中,索拉非尼在未经治疗的肾癌患者中导致的PFS与IFN-α-2a相似。然而,索拉非尼治疗患者的肿瘤缩小率更高,QOL更好,耐受性改善。疾病进展后索拉非尼剂量增加以及IFN-α-2a治疗疾病进展后换用索拉非尼均带来了临床获益。