Suppr超能文献

索拉非尼与干扰素α-2a一线治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者的随机II期试验。

Randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with sorafenib versus interferon Alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Escudier Bernard, Szczylik Cezary, Hutson Thomas E, Demkow Tomasz, Staehler Michael, Rolland Frédéric, Negrier Sylvie, Laferriere Nicole, Scheuring Urban J, Cella David, Shah Sonalee, Bukowski Ronald M

机构信息

Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1280-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3342. Epub 2009 Jan 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

An open-label, phase II study to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall best response, adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes with sorafenib versus interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha-2a) in patients with untreated, advanced renal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 189 patients were randomly assigned to oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily or to subcutaneous IFN-alpha-2a 9 million U three times weekly (period 1). Sorafenib patients who progressed were dose-escalated to 600 mg twice daily; IFN-alpha-2a patients who progressed were switched to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (period 2).

RESULTS

In period 1 PFS was similar for sorafenib-treated (n = 97; 5.7 months) and IFN-alpha-2a-treated patients (n = 92; 5.6 months); more sorafenib-treated patients had tumor shrinkage (68.2% v 39.0%). Common drug-related AEs (Grades > or = 3) for sorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction (11.3%), diarrhea (6.2%), and rash/desquamation (6.2%); for IFN-alpha-2a, these were fatigue (10.0%), nausea (3.3%), flu-like syndrome (2.2%), and anorexia (2.2%). Sorafenib-treated patients reported fewer symptoms, better quality of life (QOL), and greater treatment satisfaction. In period 2, 41.9% of patients who received sorafenib 600 mg twice daily (n = 43) experienced tumor reduction (median PFS, 3.6 months). After the switch to sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, tumors were reduced in 76.2% of 50 patients (median PFS, 5.3 months). AEs were mostly grade 1 to 2; no increase in AEs of grades > or = 3 occurred after sorafenib dose escalation.

CONCLUSION

In this study, sorafenib resulted in similar PFS as IFN-alpha-2a in patients with untreated RCC. However, sorafenib-treated patients experienced greater rates of tumor size reduction, better QOL, and improved tolerability. Both dose escalation of sorafenib after progression and a switch to sorafenib after progression on IFN-alpha-2a resulted in clinical benefit.

摘要

目的

一项开放标签的II期研究,旨在评估索拉非尼与干扰素α-2a(IFN-α-2a)相比,在未经治疗的晚期肾癌患者中的无进展生存期(PFS)、总体最佳反应、不良事件(AE)以及患者报告的结局。

患者和方法

总共189例患者被随机分配至口服索拉非尼400 mg,每日两次,或皮下注射IFN-α-2a 900万单位,每周三次(第1阶段)。疾病进展的索拉非尼治疗患者剂量增加至600 mg,每日两次;疾病进展的IFN-α-2a治疗患者换用索拉非尼400 mg,每日两次(第2阶段)。

结果

在第1阶段,索拉非尼治疗组(n = 97;5.7个月)和IFN-α-2a治疗组(n = 92;5.6个月)的PFS相似;更多索拉非尼治疗患者出现肿瘤缩小(68.2%对39.0%)。索拉非尼常见的与药物相关的AE(≥3级)为手足皮肤反应(11.3%)、腹泻(6.2%)和皮疹/脱屑(6.2%);IFN-α-2a的这些AE为疲劳(10.0%)、恶心(3.3%)、流感样综合征(2.2%)和厌食(2.2%)。索拉非尼治疗患者报告的症状更少,生活质量(QOL)更好,治疗满意度更高。在第2阶段,每日两次接受600 mg索拉非尼治疗的患者中,41.9%(n = 43)出现肿瘤缩小(中位PFS,3.6个月)。换用每日两次400 mg索拉非尼后,50例患者中有76.2%出现肿瘤缩小(中位PFS,5.3个月)。AE大多为1至2级;索拉非尼剂量增加后,≥3级AE未增加。

结论

在本研究中,索拉非尼在未经治疗的肾癌患者中导致的PFS与IFN-α-2a相似。然而,索拉非尼治疗患者的肿瘤缩小率更高,QOL更好,耐受性改善。疾病进展后索拉非尼剂量增加以及IFN-α-2a治疗疾病进展后换用索拉非尼均带来了临床获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验