Suppr超能文献

晚期肾细胞癌一线治疗的疗效:客观缓解、无进展生存期和总生存期的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

Efficacy of First-Line Treatments for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Objective Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Overall Survival.

作者信息

Schmidinger Manuela, Rane Pratik P, Yan Kevin, Druyts Eric, Burgents Joseph, Sundaram Murali, Peer Avivit

机构信息

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Care Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Merck & Co., Inc., 351 N Sumneytown Pike, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA.

出版信息

Target Oncol. 2025 May;20(3):375-387. doi: 10.1007/s11523-025-01147-3. Epub 2025 May 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to indirectly compare pembrolizumab + lenvatinib to other treatments of interest for first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

METHODS

A systematic literature review searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases for relevant randomized controlled trials of interest up to 30 January 2024, with an updated search conducted on 17 March 2025. A fixed effect Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to determine the relative treatment effects for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

When comparing against other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), a statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.53; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.40-0.71), avelumab + axitinib (HR = 0.71; 95% Crl: 0.53-0.94), atezolizumab + bevacizumab (HR = 0.54; 95% CrI: 0.40-0.73), and pembrolizumab + axitinib (HR = 0.69; 95% CrI: 0.51-0.91). Treatment with pembrolizumab + lenvatinib resulted in no statistically significant difference between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and other combination ICI-based therapies for OS. A statistically significant higher ORR was shown for pembrolizumab + lenvatinib compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (odd ratio (OR) = 3.29; 95% Crl: 2.21-4.93), pembrolizumab + axitinib (OR = 1.92; 95% CrI: 1.27-2.94), atezolizumab + bevacizumab (OR = 4.05; 95% Crl: 2.71-6.05), bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab (OR = 6.20; 95% CrI: 3.69-10.48), and nivolumab (OR = 5.92; 95% CrI: 2.70-13.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall population analysis indicated that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib improves PFS and ORR compared with other approved ICI combination therapies in first-line aRCC. No significant differences in OS were observed between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and other combination immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在间接比较帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼与一线晚期肾细胞癌(aRCC)其他相关治疗方法。

方法

进行系统文献综述,检索截至2024年1月30日的EMBASE、MEDLINE和CENTRAL数据库中相关的随机对照试验,并于2025年3月17日进行更新检索。进行固定效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)以确定总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)的相对治疗效果。

结果

与其他免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)相比,帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼与纳武利尤单抗+伊匹木单抗相比,PFS有统计学显著改善(风险比(HR)=0.53;95%可信区间(CrI):0.40 - 0.71),与阿维鲁单抗+阿昔替尼相比(HR = 0.71;95% Crl:0.53 - 0.94),与阿替利珠单抗+贝伐珠单抗相比(HR = 0.54;95% CrI:0.40 - 0.73),与帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼相比(HR = 0.69;95% CrI:0.51 - 0.91)。帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼治疗与其他基于ICI的联合疗法在OS方面无统计学显著差异。与纳武利尤单抗+伊匹木单抗相比(优势比(OR)=3.29;95% Crl: 2.21 - 4.93)、与帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼相比(OR = 1.92;95% CrI:1.27 - 2.94)、与阿替利珠单抗+贝伐珠单抗相比(OR = 4.05;95% Crl:2.71 - 6.05)、与贝姆培加德西鲁单抗+纳武利尤单抗相比(OR = 6.20;95% CrI:3.69 - 10.48)以及与纳武利尤单抗相比(OR = 5.92;95% CrI:2.70 - 13.24),帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼显示出统计学显著更高的ORR。

结论

总体人群分析表明,在一线aRCC中,与其他已批准的ICI联合疗法相比,帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼可改善PFS和ORR。帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼与其他基于免疫检查点抑制剂的联合疗法在OS方面未观察到显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验