Schmidinger Manuela, Rane Pratik P, Yan Kevin, Druyts Eric, Burgents Joseph, Sundaram Murali, Peer Avivit
Department of Urology, Comprehensive Care Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Merck & Co., Inc., 351 N Sumneytown Pike, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA.
Target Oncol. 2025 May;20(3):375-387. doi: 10.1007/s11523-025-01147-3. Epub 2025 May 6.
The purpose of this study was to indirectly compare pembrolizumab + lenvatinib to other treatments of interest for first-line advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).
A systematic literature review searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases for relevant randomized controlled trials of interest up to 30 January 2024, with an updated search conducted on 17 March 2025. A fixed effect Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to determine the relative treatment effects for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).
When comparing against other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), a statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.53; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.40-0.71), avelumab + axitinib (HR = 0.71; 95% Crl: 0.53-0.94), atezolizumab + bevacizumab (HR = 0.54; 95% CrI: 0.40-0.73), and pembrolizumab + axitinib (HR = 0.69; 95% CrI: 0.51-0.91). Treatment with pembrolizumab + lenvatinib resulted in no statistically significant difference between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and other combination ICI-based therapies for OS. A statistically significant higher ORR was shown for pembrolizumab + lenvatinib compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (odd ratio (OR) = 3.29; 95% Crl: 2.21-4.93), pembrolizumab + axitinib (OR = 1.92; 95% CrI: 1.27-2.94), atezolizumab + bevacizumab (OR = 4.05; 95% Crl: 2.71-6.05), bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab (OR = 6.20; 95% CrI: 3.69-10.48), and nivolumab (OR = 5.92; 95% CrI: 2.70-13.24).
The overall population analysis indicated that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib improves PFS and ORR compared with other approved ICI combination therapies in first-line aRCC. No significant differences in OS were observed between pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and other combination immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies.
本研究旨在间接比较帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼与一线晚期肾细胞癌(aRCC)其他相关治疗方法。
进行系统文献综述,检索截至2024年1月30日的EMBASE、MEDLINE和CENTRAL数据库中相关的随机对照试验,并于2025年3月17日进行更新检索。进行固定效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)以确定总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)的相对治疗效果。
与其他免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)相比,帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼与纳武利尤单抗+伊匹木单抗相比,PFS有统计学显著改善(风险比(HR)=0.53;95%可信区间(CrI):0.40 - 0.71),与阿维鲁单抗+阿昔替尼相比(HR = 0.71;95% Crl:0.53 - 0.94),与阿替利珠单抗+贝伐珠单抗相比(HR = 0.54;95% CrI:0.40 - 0.73),与帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼相比(HR = 0.69;95% CrI:0.51 - 0.91)。帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼治疗与其他基于ICI的联合疗法在OS方面无统计学显著差异。与纳武利尤单抗+伊匹木单抗相比(优势比(OR)=3.29;95% Crl: 2.21 - 4.93)、与帕博利珠单抗+阿昔替尼相比(OR = 1.92;95% CrI:1.27 - 2.94)、与阿替利珠单抗+贝伐珠单抗相比(OR = 4.05;95% Crl:2.71 - 6.05)、与贝姆培加德西鲁单抗+纳武利尤单抗相比(OR = 6.20;95% CrI:3.69 - 10.48)以及与纳武利尤单抗相比(OR = 5.92;95% CrI:2.70 - 13.24),帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼显示出统计学显著更高的ORR。
总体人群分析表明,在一线aRCC中,与其他已批准的ICI联合疗法相比,帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼可改善PFS和ORR。帕博利珠单抗+乐伐替尼与其他基于免疫检查点抑制剂的联合疗法在OS方面未观察到显著差异。